RSS Feed
  1. “Duty” Trumps “rights”

    February 21, 2014 by Tunya

    Erosion, usurpation, of parent rights has been going on a long time.  From public school sytems, from government agencies, from voluntary organizations, and especially from increasing literature challenging parental primacy in education.  And to be especially noted, from universities and faculties of education, sociology, anthropoilogy, ethnography, eco-psychology, political science, etc.

     

    Biologically, practicaly every creature on this EARTH has been endowed with an instinctual sense to bring their YOUNG to a state of SELF-SUFFICIENCY. 

    This is why the matter of DUTY trumping RIGHTS is important to uinderstand.

     


  2. Parent Meetings With School Officials

    January 20, 2014 by Tunya

    A meeting with school officials can be daunting — all these related meanings with different twists convey the absolute TERROR some parents may feel — intimidating, unnerving, scary, overwhelming, demoralizing.  You get the picture.  Parents can be dumbfounded, regardless of their composure in other settings in their capable lives.  There are far too many instances where parents are made to feel INADEQUATE, and this won’t help.  If your dealings on behalf of your child have come to a point where “THE MEETING” is scheduled, here are some pointers:

    FIRST:             Make sure any meeting is convenient to you.  You can ask for more convenient times.  Especially, if you need to bring a lawyer.

    SECOND:        You should NEVER go to a meeting by yourself.  Take someone with you, and not just for comfort, but also as witness.  Sometimes these events are the beginning of a longer journey.  A priest, a lawyer, just about anyone will do (a neighbor), even if they don’t speak.

    THIRD:            Take in a Tape Recorder and turn it on immediately at the start.  Say that the meeting will be taped in case you need it later.  You can place the tape in a sealed envelope and keep it with you.  You may need it for court purposes or for a meeting in Executive session with the School Board.

    FOURTH:        You, as parent have the RIGHT and DUTY to monitor your child’s HEALTH, EDUCATION AND HAPPINESS.  That’s one reason we have Report Cards.  But, also, you are always monitoring your child’s physical and mental health.  You do this because you’re living with your child and know his or her day and night behaviors, feelings and fears. Your concerns, beyond the academic, should be shared.

    FIFTH:      Malpractice court action is a possibility.  If your child is suffering HARM — that school behaviors are causing FEARS, PHOBIAS OR NIGHTMARES — and you can get medical verification in support, you can sue.  Officials need to know this is an extreme, but available, path parents can follow.

    SIXTH:     Do not hesitate to withdraw the child from the school if you see it in the best interests of the child — a mental health break may be indicated.  Home education by correspondence courses or other means discovered using the Internet or local support groups could provide the tools and peace of mind for a home-based program.

    [My comment:  Parents must realize that, by law, in the end result, THEY ARE responsible for their child’s education.  Only in totalitarian nations does the state dictate.  Please see this list of Parent Rights, codified after studying good practice about this matter         http://genuine-education-reform-today.org/?s=parent+rights ]


  3. Teacher-Parents are hugely advantaged – unfair

    August 19, 2013 by Tunya

    Snarky Educators Who Oppose Parent Rights

    Ironic, isn’t it — that those who belittle parent choice are members of a class that benefits disproportionately from what the public education system offers.

    The special class of people, which benefits most from the offerings of the free public education system, is the insiders in the system — the teachers who are parents with kids in the system.

    Let me jot down some of the unfair advantages and privileges enjoyed by teacher/parents, who as insiders, extract what they need for their children.  Let’s be very mindful that in reality the public school system is a rationed service, with scarce resources, which simply cannot accommodate all the requests made by parents in general.  Here is how teacher/parents work the system — leaving your average parent in the dust!

    1   Teacher/parents know the language, the words, to use.

    2   T/Ps know how to navigate the system:  who to see, what to say, what to ask for.

    3   T/Ps know how to interpret assessments, scores and evaluations and know where their child really stands in grade level and expectations.

    4   If the student is behind in reading, for example, the T/P can make up the deficiency at home or hire a tutor for precisely what is needed.

    5   T/Ps are at an income level where buying extra tutoring is no problem.

    6   If the T/P’s child might be special needs a psychosocial assessment is readily arranged —  contrast with the often two-year waiting period for other parents.

    7   Once such an assessment is made, an IEP (Individual Education Program) is negotiated between school and parent, and here again the T/P is advantaged because of knowledge of the maximum that can be available.

    8   Once the IEP is in place, extra funding and resources are made available.

    9   If a T/P sees there is a poor fit between their child and a teacher it is relatively easy to switch teachers as again, the “insider” language is a bonus — knowing how to explain why the child would be better off in an “unthreatening” way that does not reflect on the other teacher.

    10   T/Ps feel keenly the urgency of child growth and development — he’s a child only once coming this way — and press their case with adeptness and urgency which in other parents would be seen as “pushy” or “helicopter parenting”.

    11   T/Ps are knowledgeable about the legalities of malpractice and can use this as background allusion to further press their case if needed.

    12   T/Ps are conscious of the safeguards that should be in place in cases of bullying, adoption of new untested programs or psychological invasions of privacy and know how to insist on safeguards or know how to exit from questionable practices.

    13   T/Ps know full well what is a healthy and productive learning experience and if all efforts fail know how to ride out a crisis and provide make-up solutions or antidotes at home. 

    14   T/Ps know that they are the client in a school situation when their child is at issue and know the routes, angles and procedures to follow if they meet with resistance instead of responsiveness and are not easily discouraged from pursuing their rights and entitlements.

    15   Frankly, T/Ps fully know parent rights in education and just don’t want them written down for other parents to know.

    So, Parent Trigger is one of the best things that’s happened to government public education in the last 150 years.  One just has to read the book — Parents and Schools: the 150 year struggle for control in American education by William Cutler — to know that any new gains in responsiveness to parents is significant in this field where producer capture rules the roost.

    Parent rights should be there — up front and center for all parents — not just those who have an inside track.  See Parents Rights & Their Children's Education http://www.parentsteachingparents.net/2014/07/parent-rights-their-childrens-education/

     


  4. Launching PARENTS TEACHING PARENTS

    February 28, 2013 by Tunya

    I prepared this site as a handy place

    • to record efforts in the cause of parent involvement in education

    • to pass on what might be of use to parents today

    I’ve been, by definition, a “reformer” as I’ve stood up for parents’ rights and duties in the education of their children — for 50 years. My involvement connected me with similar parents and groups around most of North America — our challenges are comparable. It’s been a dismal journey. Parents are still largely excluded.

    What is troubling today is that reformers are being fiercely attacked for their well-meaning efforts. Maybe there are different kinds of “reformers”, but I will maintain that parents seeking to be meaningfully involved with the education of their children should be respected and welcomed.

    This site will be devoted to keep parents in the picture, front and center.

    The THREE things to immediately bring forward are:

    1. Parent Rights and Their Children’s Education. This is a compilation of what we see as best practice to help parents advocate and get the best education for their children. http://genuine-education-reform-today.org/2010/04/06/parent-rights-and-their-childrens-education/

    2. Effective Schools Checklist. This was compiled in 1978 by Dr. Ron Edmonds of Harvard and has stood the testy of time as to validity. But it’s not being faithfully applied. Here is where parents can bring forward this material if their schools don’t already apply these principles. http://education-advisory.org/2007/08/effective-schools-checklist/

    3. Home Education: the third option. I was active in the early stages of the home education movement in North America, with some association with John Holt and the Moores. This is the ultimate commitment some parents undertake on behalf of their children’s education. http://education-advisory.org/2006/11/home-education-the-third-option/

    I will also do BOOK REVIEWS. These are the first two I will report on:

    01) Parental Involvement and the Political Principle: Why the existing governance structure of schools should be abolished, Seymour B Sarason, 1995

    02) So Little for the Mind, Hilda Neatby, 1953. (& reviewing her influence in the field)

    I will also deal with major THEMES and the first one will be the matter of SUBSIDIARITY. This was brought to my attention by articles on the anti-reform movement in the United States and the latest protest in Texas where Diane Ravitch, an education historian and a prolific “anti-reform” blogger, was a prominent speaker.

    Subsidiarity came up in one of the items from this story from the Washington Post “An Education Reform Warning for Democrats http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/wp/2013/02/27/an-education-reform-warning-for-democrats/?print=1

    Jerry Brown, Governor of California, critical about top-down decisions from afar concerning curriculum standards and accountability testing, said:

    “This year, as you consider new education laws, I ask you to consider the principle of Subsidiarity. Subsidiarity is the idea that a central authority should only perform those tasks which cannot be performed at a more immediate or local level. In other words, higher or more remote levels of government, like the state, should render assistance to local school districts, but always respect their primary jurisdiction and the dignity and freedom of teachers and students.
    Subsidiarity is offended when distant authorities prescribe in minute detail what is taught, how it is taught and how it is to be measured. I would prefer to trust our teachers who are in the classroom each day, doing the real work – lighting fires in young minds.”

    There is further amplification of “subsidiarity” in the comments section of this article. I, of course, see subsidiarity as including parents at the ground level as well.

    PARTICIPATION in PTP — Since this is all about parents passing on their wisdom I encourage comments, suggestions and questions through the contact form or COMMENTS. Names will not be published.

     


  5. Responsibilities of teaching

    January 4, 2017 by Tunya

    The Responsibilities Of Teaching

    I dispute and object to teaching being called a “profession”. Teaching is teaching. Some say it’s a “calling”. Some can teach and some can’t.

    I’m reminded of the few, very few, teachers — maybe 1 in 200 — who, when talking about their love of and dedication to teaching will mention their awareness of the biblical injunction in James 3:1 — Not many of you should presume to be teachers, my brothers, because you know that we who teach will be judged more strictly.

    I like Greg Ashman’s devotion to teaching and really appreciate his dissemination of useful research and insights. I think they do help in keeping the vocation of teaching on its toes. Look forward to more via this blog and reports about progress in the field in 2017. Thanks, Greg.

    My critique comes from a long history of involvement. First: I attained a teaching certificate a long time ago from a teacher’s college, which I thought was a prerequisite if I was to teach my own children. Not required. Also — poor preparation if I was ever to be in charge of a classroom. Second: My main interest always was with the parental responsibility in education. I worked to promote home education and parent rights in education. I soon realized, after much evidence, that the field was predominantly a self- serving industry. Even some teachers were dismayed that children’s interests were not the foremost priority. Third: I now see the need for greater choices for both parents and teachers. As a grandmother I see that today’s children cannot be well served by the one-size-fits-all style of the past.

     

    [Comment made to blog post by Greg Ashman, Australia, Filling the Pail, Position Statement, Jan 05, 2017[