RSS Feed

January, 2014

  1. Home Education as a “Movement”

    January 11, 2014 by Tunya

    The Birth of the Home Education Movement – 1972 – Mexico

    I remember people ardently ranting and raging against oppressive compulsory schooling.  About poverty and the thwarted aspirations of the poor.  About the escalation of schooling as destructive as the escalation of weapons. About school and medical systems showing declining results as more money was being poured in …

    These were the heady discussions students and academics enjoyed at CIDOC (Center for Intercultural Documentation) in Cuernavaca, Mexico, in the Spring and Summer of 1972. Deinstitutionalization was the main theme.

    I had just completed teacher training at Ottawa Teachers College and was there (two young daughters in tow) to listen to the lectures of Ivan Illich who had just published the book Deschooling Society.

    His ideas had already spread via many articles in magazines and book reviews.  His complete book is available, all short 116 pages, for reading online or downloading athttp://www.davidtinapple.com/illich/ If you dare comprehend the book, you will be a different person.

    “School is obligatory and becomes schooling for schooling’s sake: an enforced stay in the company of teachers.”

    “Unquestionably, the educational process will gain from the deschooling of society even though this demand sounds to many schoolmen like treason to the enlightenment. But it is enlightenment itself that is now being snuffed out in the schools.”

    “Two centuries ago the United States led the world in a movement to disestablish the monopoly of a single church. Now we need the constitutional disestablishment of the monopoly of the school.”

    These words were spoken way before we had online education. If people pride themselves now on the advances of this technological magic, just read the chapter of 40 years ago, “Learning Webs”.  “Everywhere the hidden curriculum of schooling initiates the citizen to the myth that bureaucracies guided by scientific knowledge are efficient and benevolent. … a huge professional apparatus of educators and buildings which in fact restricts the public’s chances for learning … It should use modern technology to make free speech, free assembly, and a free press truly universal and, therefore, fully educational.”

    Illich was a priest, a philosopher, an inspired prophet. He laced his talks with Greek myths and poetry. When we heard his version of how Prometheus tricked the gods out of their monopoly of fire, we tried to project that concept to health, education, welfare and other fields monopolized by the state.

    Neither Illich nor any of our discussions ever conceived of the notion of home education as a movement, though we frequently talked about home care of the sick. It was not till I had a discussion with John Holt, the author of such books as “How Children Learn” and “How Children Fail” that the movement toward home education started to percolate.

    So, one morning, beneath a heavily-laden mango tree from which John partook, this was our conversation:

    John: Now that you have completed teacher training, where are you going to teach?

    Tunya: I didn’t get training to teach in a school. I took it to teach my own children.

    J: Is it legal?

    T: Yes, I’ve studied the legislations. It’s possible across North America and England. Parents are to cause their children to obtain an education at a school or elsewhere. It’s this “elsewhere” clause that allows home education.

    J: Well, at least you’re now qualified to teach them.

    T: I also found out that you don’t need a qualification to teach your own children.

    J. What about socialization? They’ll be different.

    T: Kids should be individuals. They’ll have plenty of friends from the groups we belong to. Besides, there is a lot of negative socialization in school …

    J: What if they want to go to college?

    T: They will probably be strong, independent learners and will have an advantage to transfer in…

    J: SMART CITY!

    5 years later John Holt, who already had a large mailing list of people interested in education reform, started the Home Education Movement with his newsletter, “Growing without Schooling” and the rest is history …

    Meanwhile, Dr. Raymond Moore was spreading the word amongst his mainly Christian audience (The Learning Home) and paid frequent visits to Vancouver, Canada, especially when we held Home Learning Fairs in the 80’s.

    Besides jump-starting the home education movement John Holt had the wisdom and foresight to caution against the threats and antagonisms that arise from people splitting off from conventional schooling. This quote is worth posting front and center on our bulletin boards, and deserves a lot of pondering in our present day (Feb 2010):

     

    “Today freedom has different enemies. It must be fought for in different ways. It will take very different qualities of mind and heart to save it.”

    The link to my article which helped validate the movement in Canada is here: Home Education – The Third Option (1987)http://education-advisory.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/homeeducation-third-option.pdf

    See also: Parent Rights and Their Children’s Education (1977)http://genuine-education-reformtoday.org/2010/04/06/parent-rights-and-their-childrens-education/

    by Tunya Audain

    Education Advisory http://genuine-education-reform-today.org/

    2010/02/09

     

  2. Thinking Skills Then & Now

    January 10, 2014 by Tunya

    Critical Thinking is one of the competencies deemed essential for career, college and citizenship in the 21st Century.  However, there is still a tug-of-war between what shape CT will take — logical approaches to issues or political analyses regarding domination/victim issues (also called critical pedagogy).

    In the 80s thinking skills were still free of political tones and undertones.

    These quotes are from a Dec 28, 1988 News Release from the Ministry of Education, British Columbia, Canada (25 years ago, a quarter century ago !) :

    “Ministry of Education promotes thinking skills seminars

    – The teaching of creative thinking in BC schools will be fostered  . . . through a series of seminars for teachers

    – as many as 80 teams of educators will be subsidized with grants of up to $1,000 per team

    – the seminars, by Creative Learning International [will be joined] by guest lecturers Tony Buzan and Edward De Bono, both internationally known authorities in creative thinking.

    – Education Minister Tony Brummet said that the funding is in keeping with the Ministry’s emphasis on developing higher-order thinking skills in BC students.

     -“ Knowledge is growing at an ever-increasing rate,” said the Minister. “Our future citizens must be able to define the information they require, to discriminate between the important and unimportant, to set priorities, to make wise decisions while maintaining open minds.

    “They should be able to ask imaginative questions, define and set goals and solve problems creatively.” 


  3. Indefensible Education Malpractices

    January 9, 2014 by Tunya

    From the book, Educators on Trial, James Leary

    • Giving a learning assignment as punishment
    • Punishing the whole class for the actions of a few
    • Using grades to manipulate or discipline students
    • Grading students on a curve (so many As, Bs, regardless of the achievement of the students
    • Tests that do not cover material taught
    • Advancing students who have not learned the prerequisites
    • Prescribing the same material to all in a wide-ability class
    • Assigning meaningless homework

     


  4. “Climate Crime” On the Curriculum?

    January 8, 2014 by Tunya

    Freedom is precioius.  Once lost, it is hard to regain.  But, it might be regained with such a vigor as to ensure that vigilance is not just an empty word, but a constant.  Cicero said it so long ago:

    “Freedom suppressed and again regained bites with keener fangs than freedom never endangered.”

    Environmentalism, sustainability, global stewardship — these are bywords by which school curriculums are being steered in the "transformations" underway in K-12 schools.  

    Hopefully balance will prevail and that discussion and school work will provide for counter positions.  

    The movie "Climate Crime" tries to show how welll-intentioned environmental initiatives can actually be more harmful to the areas involved than expected.  

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5igyXyJKL_0

      

     

     

     

     


  5. Withholding Report Cards — Immoral, Illegal

    January 7, 2014 by Tunya

    Parent Rights Endangered in BC’s Teacher Strike (2011-12) 

    1,  Parent rights bargained away

    Parents were not at the table when their rights were bargained away.  No one spoke up or objected to their rights being used as a bargaining chip.  It’s like having a father sell his wife or a parent sell a child.  It’s as bad as that!

    2.  Parents deprived of a comparative report  —  graded

    The right lost to parents was not being able to receive their first progress report card this Fall.  Three such graded report cards are to be sent to parents and that is specified in the School Act.

    3.  Withholding reports is illegal

    Parents not receiving these cards according to the School Act makes this illegal.  Parents could sue.

    4.  Parents obtaining private assessment should be able to charge back.

    Since parents are supposed to receive such a progress report card which would help them compare if the child is at grade level, below, or above.  Surely then if they obtain such a assessment privately, shouldn’t the fee be chargeable to the school board?

    5.  The rule of law is being held in contempt

    What’s the use of legislation and laws if people ignore them?

    6.  Reports are tools for parents for making informed decisions

    With a report card parents are better able to decide if they have made a good decision in enrolling their child in that school.  If the parent is dissatisfied, they are well-equipped to either advocate for better services or withdraw to another setting  —  another school or home education.

                The suspicion is that people in the system – unionized teachers AND admin, etc  —  don’t mind keeping parents in the dark, so that they are handicapped from removing students too easily.  Keep the kid in the seat above all else, for the full dollar.

    7.  Not receiving the report card is equivalent to having a contract broken.

    The quid pro quo of contracts is I do something, you do something.  I enroll my child, you provide me with a report of how they’re doing.

    8.  With the strike continuing indefinitely, the next two reports are also unlikely.

    It’s way too late for parents to make alternative arrangements so late in the year.  A whole year could easily be wasted.  Private schools say they receive a good number of new enrollments in January.

    9.  The new replacement procedure makes parents beholden to the teachers.

    The onus is now on the parents to initiate communication by email, phone or other means and any meeting must be in school hours.  Working parents would find this difficult.

    10.  This shift seriously undermines the authority of the parents in relation to government schools.

    Instead of public schools being seen as accountable to parents, it is now the parents who are seen as the supplicants or petitioners to the central government.

    11. All the points above serve to erode the centrality and primacy of the family in education of the young. Undermining the role of the family in education is a serious affront to the health of civil society.

    12.  All of the  points above add further fuel to the arguments for having more publicly-funded alternatives to the public school system so that families have more elbow room to help accommodate their children’s educational needs.  We live in a free society, don’t we?   Vouchers, charters, School based management…

    13.  With the messaging from some union leaders that the strike could go on “indefinitely” and one pres, Karpuk from Kamloops saying, “we should stay here forever”  I really wonder if keeping parents domesticated and “begging” for feedback, and principals getting punished by overwork and sick leaves, and teachers (workers) in charge of the workplace, is probably what these progressives want anyway ….