RSS Feed

‘Absurdities’ Category

  1. When will teachers learn?

    April 2, 2016 by Tunya

    Which Other Professional Besides A Teacher Would Say That?

    Only in education would you hear someone say — “Teaching is such that it takes a lifetime to get good at it and then you retire.” John Myers, Professor, on Educhatter blog, Mar 26, 2016

    No doctor, engineer or accountant would say that ! Nor, would they be allowed to remain in their profession for long! To use your clientele and your field continually as subjects of experimentation and a playpen for your own learning is really upsetting and disturbing. Is this a responsible profession or a “disabling” one as Ivan Illich used to say and write about ? Why do we have to appeal to a Daniel Willingham to sort this out — aren’t there professional and ethical standards in education?

    It’s only in education that there is some kind of accepted (or is it somehow intimidated) tolerance that educators can have so many excuses to avoid proven standard practices. “Methods” is a bad word to use in conversations with teachers — “Don’t tell me how to teach. I don’t tell my doctor how to take out my appendix.” — is a frequent (or variant) reply when a parent dares mention “methods”.

    Where we’re at right now is very much where we were 45 years ago when I tried to get parent voice more heard. There actually was a much greater awareness then and a good number of groups supporting the parent voice. Unfortunately and regrettably, not so much now. All I was able to accomplish was to play a role in the launching of the home education movement — https://gaither.wordpress.com/2011/02/17/john-holts-conversion-to-home-education/

    Discredited and questionable practices and developmentally inappropriate expectations of the young are still practiced and parent qualms are still dismissed. And parents are still stuck with few choices or exits or any sympathetic listeners in the defensive system.

    Both Reading and Math are considered foundational skills that the young student should start mastering at an early stage. Where are we at with these two? Math is a continual worry and news articles continue to expose the issues.

    Regarding Reading there is a worry of colossal scale! At an international conference on comparative education held in Vancouver recently (CIES, Mar 6-10,’16) at one of the sessions it was announced that after considerable testing an initiative would soon be launched by UN and other agencies to help developing countries with reading programs. BUT, within the literature there lurks one sentence that dooms the enterprise:

    “The reading “wars” are alive and well in many low-income countries, often miring ministries of education and teaching centers in seemingly endless debates between the “whole-language” and “phonics-based” approaches.” (pg 4 Early Grade Reading Assessment Toolkit)

    What should be done? Those poor families will not be getting the best information or practices to help their children to read as promised.

    [Most of the above is also posted to Educhatter blog ]


  2. Is it defensiveness that calls for censorship?

    April 2, 2016 by Tunya

    Unfortunate That The Distasteful Topic Of “Censorship” Emerges

    “Well, I’m surprised this idea of “child abuse” still gets by moderation. “ Stephen Hurley, Society for Quality Education, April 02, 2016

    Surely the author of this quote does not propose that my comment to this blog should have been denied?

    I had mentioned that “Stories abound concerning crying, frustrated students” who are confused about some current educational experimental practices. I said: “This abuse of children is so painful to watch.”

    In another comment on this blog I had shown how my 45 years in the parent involvement cause still drives my efforts. I reflected how many years back this was an important topic with many groups and agencies concerned but that regrettably this was no longer the case. Parents are more diminished than ever. I will copy some of the material I wrote in 1979 on the topic:

    EDUCATION ABUSE OF CHILREN

    Raised awareness helps us see that children’s interests must be protected wherever they are. The schools have their share of practices which hurt children and parents can be on the alert for these and intervene when needed:

    1 EXPERIMENTATION — . . . Anything new which has not been in your school before should have safeguards built in so that children are not used, either for half-baked amateurish effort or major shifts in educational practice without the public knowing . . . Two key documents on human experimentation apply to schools as they do elsewhere: Nuremberg Code and the Declaration of Helsinki . . . (I Don’t Want My Kid to be a Guinea Pig, Lipsitz, 1977)

    2 INCOMPETENT TEACHERS — “there are thousands of mentally ill, severely disturbed, and incompetent teachers in our schools who should not be teaching children”. . . ( Positive Mental Health for Teachers, Mackiel, 1979)

    3 HOMEWORK ABUSE — . . . There is abundant literature for teachers to know what are good and bad homework practices.

    4 “MILKING” THE EDUCATION DOLLAR — . . . without proper monitoring more and more of the educational dollar will be diverted . . .

    5 FAILURE TO TEACH FOR COMPETENCE — It is known that most children can be taught the basics of most school subjects . . . Educationally handicapping practices which fail to remediate and educate all children in the basics should not be tolerated.

    6 EXCLUDING PARENTS FROM EDUCATIONAL PLANNING — . . . Failure to work in partnership with the home handicaps the child’s educational potential.

    [The above is a very abbreviated shape of the original Tipsheet on Educational Abuse of Children in “Education Advisory”.]

    [[ posted on SQE 20160402 ]]


  3. Public Education — one long experiment !

    April 2, 2016 by Tunya

    Why Is Schooling So Experimental — Still?


    No other field — medicine, engineering, pharmacy, accounting, etc. — plays with its customers as much as the education field. This should not be allowed as there are no safeguards against the damage being done. What is joyful and exciting for educators is still a “cat-&-mouse” game for students — students still get whacked in the end. Stories abound concerning crying, frustrated students and desperate parents seeking alternatives.


    The other professional fields mentioned do not have hosts of frustrated subjects who are denied best practices.


    The public money gathered for the purpose of education of the young should not be so poorly managed that discredited methods are still allowed to proliferate. And experimentation without human-subject protocols in place should be stopped altogether.


    One big problem is that the governors of this abysmal situation still hold that one-size-fits all and that we are still looking for one-best-system. Well, that stubborn belief (religion) is over. A “relinquishment” movement is building. Time to let go folks. Choices via the public education dollar are long overdue and people who oppose what they judge are inappropriate practices in our near-monopoly schools should have access to their portion of the dollar allocated to education to find alternatives.

    This abuse of children is so painful to watch.

    [ http://www.societyforqualityeducation.org/index.php/blog/read/math-for-lifeposted on SQE 20160402 —  Math For Life ]


  4. Soft Terrorism descends on teaching of reading

    March 28, 2016 by Tunya

    A Soft Terrorism Plagues the Reading Field

    “Remember, reading is ‘caught’, not ‘taught’ “— that is the phrase I heard in an audiotape last year. This was part of a training program for volunteers who had offered to help a literacy initiative in a school district in British Columbia. What that small phrase alone tells me is that the method being used to teach reading was of the Whole-Language variety.

    In most of the Western world two reading methods continue to compete for dominance — Phonics or Whole-Language. Only in Germany was W-L outlawed for the purely practical reason — it was tried in 80s but after disastrous results was declared bad practice.

    The reason I classify this contest as “soft terrorism” is because a general intimidation has settled on the reading issues where most people are now pussy-footing and refusing to use these inflammatory words — “phonics” or “whole-language” !

    Marilyn Jager Adams in her forward to Jeanne Chall’s book, The Academic Achievement Challenge (2002 edition) said:
    “ . . . reviewing the research on phonics, Chall told me that if I wrote the truth, I would lose old friends and make new enemies. She warned me that I would never again be fully accepted by my academic colleagues . . . Sadly, however, as the evidence in favor of systematic, explicit phonics instruction for beginners increased, so too did the vehemence and nastiness of the backlash. The goal became one of discrediting not just the research, but the integrity and character of those who had conducted it. Chall was treated most shabbily . . . “

    This imposed silence needs to be confronted if there is to be headway made in the goal of teaching reading to all children as a right — a goal enunciated by most nations and peoples in statements that echo the belief that life chances depend on the foundation skill of reading. UNESCO and other well-meaning agencies are planning huge efforts to address the illiteracy problems of the “developing” world, yet one document has already recognized a lurking obstacle: “The reading “wars” are alive and well in many low-income countries, often miring ministries of education and teaching centers in seemingly endless debates between the “whole-language” and “phonics-based” approaches.” (pg 4 Early Grade Reading Assessment Toolkit)

    http://www.amazon.com/Academic-Achievement-Challenge-Really-Classroom/dp/1572307684/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1459204949&sr=1-1&keywords=academic+achievement+challenge+chall


  5. Parents squeezed out in Alberta Schools policy

    March 23, 2016 by Tunya

    THE ALBERTA STANDOFF ILLUSTRATES VERY SERIOUS PROBLEMS

    The problem with sarcasm is that a percentage of readers just might actually agree! It could even be parents or teachers or public in general who would endorse whole-heartedly this cynical, acid, sneering post entitled — “Don’t Tell Father”. The way things stand in public education today I would guess that a good number might actually agree that “it would be better if schools didn't tell parents anything.”

    I like the post but would have added a disclaimer at the end — eg: ‘Of course, folks, you do realize this is sarcasm! “

    Anyway, I think what is being played out here is serious and requires urgent attention. My 3 comments to the story so far:

    PARENTAL VETO & PARENTAL SOVEREIGNTY ARE AT STAKE

    The Parent Veto is an awesome thing and is constantly under attack by usurpers of parental primacy in education. In 2011 when a surge of votes propelled Alison Redford to instant Premiership of Alberta it was claimed that three promises to the teacher establishment were the key to her electoral success. It was easy for her to quickly find $107Million in extra education funding and to scrap Gr 3 & 6 standardized tests. The third demand — abolish the parent veto — was never accomplished due to parent backlash.

    These expanded conditions in the new LGBTQ initiatives seem to undermine parental authority and sovereignty over their minor-aged children. There should be more thought and attention paid to the legal implications, especially since the line of responsibility for a child’s education rests first with the parents and then with the state as a backup service to parents

    THE MAIN ISSUE — STATE VS FAMILY

    These state initiatives to exclude or diminish families usually come from the Point-of-View of those on the left of the political spectrum. What is happening in Alberta concerning LGBTQ issues illustrates how creeping statism makes its gains at the expense of individuals.

    This issue reminded me of Hillary Clinton and her statements last year about how education is a “non-family enterprise” — http://www.c-span.org/video/?c4534543/hillary-says-education-non-family-enterprise

    Further related stories about Hillary’s worldview about education and the raising of the next generation are found in these topics as listed — Hillary Clinton against homeschooling, HC – it takes a village quote, “I believe the primary role of the state is to teach, train and raise children”, HC – parents have a secondary role, etc.

    Look this up on the Internet (Hillary Clinton – education a non-family enterprise). There was a lot of commentary crystallizing the two sides — state vs family — and this priceless comment stands out: “The education of our children is best served when the family enterprise is fully engaged.”

    DEMOCRACY IS NOT JUST SIMPLY RULE BY THE MAJORITY

    At least one comment raises the principled point that it’s not only WHAT government does but HOW that’s an issue. There seems to be a “confrontational approach” at play, says the commentator.

    In his book — Parental Involvement and the Political Principle: Why the Existing Governance Structure of Schools Should Be Abolished — Seymour B Sarason says that schooling should engage the minds, hearts and voices of parents, students and teachers together. The political principle he discusses is the obvious one of consulting those affected before policies are enacted. It doesn’t appear that the political principle was engaged in this Alberta scenario. But “politics” certainly was!