RSS Feed

‘Education Reform’ Category

  1. Rise & Fall of Public School System

    July 20, 2014 by Tunya

    Rise & Fall Of The Public Education System

    There are dozens of reasons given for the fall of the Roman Empire — decay, decadence, despotism, centralization, incompetence . . . Add rhetoric, presumptuousness . . . One article describes 210 reasons!

    Mainly, upon close reading, one finds that it becomes self-evident that disintegration would happen.  No external reform imperatives would have ensured such warranted collapse.

    The same dynamic is happening to the industry called “public education” — an experiment of nationalizing education services in many nations of the world — an operation under central command of the government and delivered by government workers.  It is so wrong of people to label reform efforts as “privatizing” when it’s simply a return to a default before government intervened. 

    John Holt, an education reformer in the 60s who reversed gears to help found the home education movement, sensed a lurking fascism within the public education system.  He said:  “Today freedom has different enemies. It must be fought for in different ways. It will take very different qualities of mind and heart to save it.”

    Above is my lead-in to comment on the large number of catch-up news that the blog, Society for Quality Education, has provided.  As a welcome clearinghouse of information for citizens come to grips with “the system” of education we endure it is important to pay tribute to the gift of technology and services like SQE in this crucial cause.

    My half-century of struggle in navigating the ropes — both for my own children and now my grandkids — has not been clear sailing.  It is disturbing to still experience, and see current parents still struggling with, unresponsive systems and officious scolding educrats.  Some educrats still dream of being “education czars” to coerce people into their mold.  Some educrats passionately support a “progressive ideology” which is more self-serving than beneficial to the students. 

    I am so thankful that people who seek and yearn for alternatives to the coercive government system can at least talk about and envision options such as charter schools, education savings accounts, vouchers and low cost private schools.  At least people are informed about the option of home education with its loads of resources and supports available.  We need also to talk about tax deductible scholarships for private education.

    Now adding to the list of readings for more perspective on the “public education system”, here is a straightforward article by Bruce Deitrick Price shining more light on the Reading and Math Wars and the ideology behind them:  Education : None Dare Call Them Commies  http://www.educationviews.org/education-call-commies/

    (See more from BDP on American Thinker.)

    to SQE 19 July 2014, http://www.societyforqualityeducation.org/index.php/blog/read/accentuate-the-positive

     


  2. who governs public education?

    July 16, 2014 by Tunya

    Posted in Society for Quality Education, July 16, 2014, http://www.societyforqualityeducation.org/index.php/blog/read/whos-on-first2

    Who Governs Public Education?

    That is the burning question. Globally, teacher unions seem to belong to one mindset — that it is teacher unions who should govern public education.

    They have three objectives: 1) providing for their members the usual union services relating to pay, benefits, job safety & security; 2) influence over policies and management of their industry; 3) retaining their ideal venue (public schools) in support of social change for an egalitarian world. 

    It is the second goal — governance — that is now in the process of legal clarification.  [This applies to BC at the moment, but will apply to ROC.]  This will take years to settle.  Meanwhile student education and development will be stunted.  Where is Teach for Canada with their six week training for new teachers?

    Teacher union erosion of governmental role in education has been chipped away for decades. When governments start to push back, turmoil erupts.

    Even today, glee and rejoicing has erupted with the news that the tough Education Secretary, Michael Gove in the UK, has been moved out of the portfolio.  Strikes by the NUT (National Union of Teachers) had been imminent.

    Next door, the Education Minister, Jeff Johnson, has just been effectively muzzled in pursuing his probe into the extent of incompetency in Alberta public schools.  The teacher union made a formal complaint.http://www.edmontonjournal.com/opinion/Thomson+Here+Education+Minister+Jeff+Johnson+save+face/10022799/story.html

    In Saskatchewan, the teacher union seems to be lining up with BC to stage a strike. 

    Many point to Finland as a leader in student achievement, a leader in teacher training, a leader in most things educational.  Yet, how many know the true nature of governance in Finland?  This is what their main spokesperson, Pasi Sahlberg, has to relay: 

    Pasi was asked the question, “Why aren’t the teachers at the decision-making table?”  Answer:  “There is a saying … that ‘war is too important to be decided by the military people’ and it’s the same with education. I think education is too important to be decided by teachers – and this has nothing to do with undervaluing teachers’ expertise . . . But the broad issues, the big issues, the principles of education should be based on a more balanced view and that’s why I would only have one practitioner in the room and divide this voice more equally to those who are the key stakeholders, (including) parents and the community members.” [The question was out of 10, how many should be teachers?]


    http://eltorofulbright.blogspot.com/2013/05/my-interview-with-pasi-sahlberg.html

    Here in BC, with our teacher strike, already projected to October, and with the Finance Minister de Jong also now involved and asking:  “Why is it so difficult in this area?”  In answer to de Jong’s question, please go back to the three goals of teacher unions, bearing in mind that it’s the leaders who generally speak.  And be reminded that in the international brotherhood of teacher unions BCTF is not its own boss — global loyalties apply.  (See goals 2 & 3 above


  3. Social Justice Teacher Unions

    May 24, 2014 by Tunya

    Social Justice Unionism Is The Agenda 

    Teacher unions are allied internationally with various militant groups who cheerlead local efforts. BC and Ontario teacher unions consider themselves campaigners for centrally directed egalitarianism. This is what I wrote yesterday about our BC crew. 

    Global Eyes On Our Teacher Strike?

    Is the whole world watching our teacher strike? Well, probably not.  However, you can be sure a certain sector of international culture is deeply interested.  I have seen our four-decades-long education struggles prominent on global socialist sites.  Our teacher union, the BCTF (BC Teachers’ Federation), is seen as a vanguard in “social justice unionism”. Reports from the battle lines are sent out regularly.

    Feedback is that “Lots of folks all over the world [are] taking notes from BCTF.”

    Fabian socialism is alive and well — into their 130th year — motto:  Educate, Agitate, Organize.  Their method — incrementalism, gradualism.  Their byword mouthed by their mascot, the tortoise — When I Strike, I Strike Hard. 

    A report just received by Rank & File (Canadian left labor website)— motto: Agitate, Educate, Organize — so similar to Fabianism — is here: The ABCs of the BC Teachers’ Fight http://rankandfile.ca/?p=2560

    Even if an arbitrator were to resolve this tumultuous faceoff between union and government there is no guarantee that our toxic “status quo” would ever end — harmful and tiresome for students, parents and taxpayers. No, it would just continue for another 40 years!

    What we do need is legislation to change the ball game.  This experiment in monopoly mass education is the lifeblood for such obsolete behaviors as we witness today.  Activists find fertile ground for their progressive political mission.

    We do need to increase the opportunities for choices and alternatives in education.  Already BC has quasi-charters — independent schools which operate with partial government funding and which must abide by contracts outside the rules of school boards and union agreements and which promise not to foster sedition. 

    We do need to move to a system where fully funded public charters are available, as in Alberta.  And, we should seriously explore the promising new funding model for personalized education via Education Savings Accounts (ESAs) as found in Arizona.

     


  4. Pasi Sahlberg On Education Policy Decision-making

    May 14, 2014 by Tunya

    [Pasi Sahlberg is no "one-trick-pony" !  Even though many educators point to Finland as an example of good practice in education it's not just priority funding that does it.  Pasi insists that considerable accountability is built into their Finnish system.  Also, they abide by basic principles of good management, that is, policy is NOT determined by teachers or unions who still push for "worker control of the workplace".  I'm trying to spread the message about the comprehensive approach and this is another comment I made to a local newspaper http://www.surreyleader.com/news/258965971.html ]

    Pasi Sahlberg On Education Policy Decision-making


    Pasi says teachers should not dominate education affairs. Sure, they should be involved, but if there were 10 at a decision-making table about policy or broad issues and principles in education, only one should be a teacher. 


    Who is Pasi Sahlberg? He is the spokesman, the good will ambassador, for the Finnish way in public education. Finland achieves superior results in international education scores and thus attracts considerable attention — including education tourism when people hope to gain insights into good practice.


    It’s not just administrations that are interested; Pasi is also the darling of teacher unions because he supports the mantra of “more funding”. 


    Whether it’s about teacher training, or special education or class size or funding formulas, the name of Pasi Sahlberg is frequently invoked as an authority. Well, here is one more area where Pasi should be listened to — policy making.

    This insight came out as a result of recent attention about a teenager visiting Finland on a Ministry contract to study teacher training. It happens that while Anjali Vyas was in Finland to meet with Pasi another researcher was also there at the same time. It is from this researcher’s blog that we gain the profound observation from Pasi, quoted below:

    “[Janet English on a Fulbright project] “I said to Pasi, "This disconnect (between policy and practice) is why I keep saying, 'Why aren’t the teachers at the decision-making table?' because if we don't have the teacher voice at the policy-making table we'll continue having the same problems we’re having now!"

    He acknowledged my words, looked straight at me and replied, "There is a saying … that 'war is too important to be decided by the military people' and it's the same with education. I think education is too important to be decided by teachers — and this has nothing to do with undervaluing teachers' expertise — but their view is very different to education. I think teachers should have a say to these issues – exactly what you said _ how to decide the teaching, how you set the standards for your own kids, how you organize your school work — this should be left to the teachers. I think too often we intervene in the wrong areas of education — we try to control what each and every teacher is doing in the classroom. We should leave those things to the professionals. But the broad issues, the principles of education should be based on a more balanced view and that's why I would only have one practitioner in the room and divide this voice more equally to those who are the key stakeholders, (including) parents and the community members — not necessarily just those working or teaching in the school."

    [English replied], "I've seen that community-driven, cooperative approach in Finland and it works. I agree with you."

    From interview with Pasi http://eltorofulbright.blogspot.ca/2013/05/my-interview-with-pasi-sahlberg.html
    This whole interview is very enlightening and well-worth a full read. 


  5. Pasi Sahlberg — Policy-making needs less teachers

    May 10, 2014 by Tunya

    Illuminating View From One Roving Guru

    What are the “Big Ideas” for BC’s Personalized Education Plan? I haven’t seen them articulated nor have I yet to see the public invited to provide their views and input. Sure, there is a lot of activity and gurus popping in and out but if public education is to be modernized, shouldn’t BC public and parents generally be asked?

    When the last go-round on this topic of environmental education was discussed in the Tyee (January) I wrote a mini-essay called “Indigenizing The Curriculum?”. I mentioned that in Australia three over-arching themes were to be integrated into the New Curriculum, but with a new government now in place, there is a comprehensive

    Review now going on. Correspondingly, there is also a separate Review of Teacher Training.

    Those three Australian overarching themes were indigenous history/culture, global engagement and sustainability. Other 21st Century Learning “transformations” projects being discussed in other Western nations (US, NZ, UK, Cdn) include “social justice” as a cross-curricular theme.

    Now, these themes would be fine if they met with general agreement in local communities and not something devised by educators or vested lobbies alone or in secret.

    I’m sure most people involved in education conversations these days are familiar with the Finnish “miracle” and with Pasi Sahlberg as the guru instrumental in producing literature and presentations on their successful approaches. I know he is the darling of teacher unions who often sponsor his trips because he strongly supports the funding, and more funding, mantra.

    But, we learn an important policy principle that Pasi endorses — a principle which is widely endorsed in public policy matters — and one which might not sit well with activist teachers. By the way, this was a huge benefit I gained from reading materials relating to the $16,000 (now $19,075) contract obtained by a teenager to travel to Finland to study teacher training. This insight is completely unrelated to this case.

    In the materials it was seen that another researcher was in Finland at the same time, a Fulbright Project, and a lengthy blog report was prepared. Here in quotes are the Pasi comments I find applicable to us in BC or anywhere else when public education policies pertain:

    “Janet English “I said to Pasi, "This disconnect (between policy and practice) is why I keep saying, 'Why aren’t the teachers at the decision-making table?' because if we don't have the teacher voice at the policy-making table we'll continue having the same

    problems we’re having now!"

    He acknowledged my words, looked straight at me and replied, "There is a saying … that 'war is too important to be decided by the military people' and it's the same with education. I think education is too important to be decided by teachers – and this has nothing to do with undervaluing teachers' expertise – but their view is very different to

    education. I think teachers should have a say to these issues – exactly what you said – how to decide the teaching, how you set the standards for your own kids, how you organize your school work – this should be left to the teachers. I think too often we intervene in the wrong areas of education – we try to control what each and every teacher is doing in the classroom. We should leave those things to the professionals. But the broad issues, the principles of education should be based on a more

    balanced view and that's why I would only have one practitioner in the room and

    divide this voice more equally to those who are the key stakeholders,

    (including) parents and the community members – not necessarily just those

    working or teaching in the school."

    I [English] replied, "I've seen that community-driven, cooperative approach in Finland and it works. I agree with you."

    From interview with Pasi http://eltorofulbright.blogspot.ca/2013/05/my-interview-with-pasi-sahlberg.html

     

    [in Tyee http://thetyee.ca/News/2014/05/10/Enviro-Ed-Not-Taught/ May 10, 2014]