RSS Feed

‘GOOD NEWS’ Category

  1. Breakout opportunity — $40 day for parents

    August 6, 2014 by Tunya

    BREAKOUT TIME FOR BC EDUCATION

     

    Parents cannot stand idly by while their children’s education development languishes. In their wisdom parents probably had already made plans for their children’s registration in a public school come Sept.  All that remained was to get supplies and legally sign them in.

     

    Mike de Jong, Minister of Finance, announced, that if the teacher strike prevents regular public school attendance come this Fall, the government would fund parents at the rate of $40 a day to “utilize that money to acquire tutoring for their children, they can use the money to explore other educational opportunities as they see fit and for some parents, it’ll be basic daycare.”

    That was not just a ploy to get collective bargaining back on track.  There are some very sound public policy and governance principles supporting this move.  There is every reason, without much restrictions, why we can’t break out and do some creative problem-solving here, knowing that good principles are at work.

     

    1  Financial – This is a Finance Matter, not an Education Matter.  Taxpayers provide dollars for education to happen.  Who better than Finance to distribute the money to qualified clients and provide accountability for the money?

     

    2  Money – Follows The Child – It is actually parental responsibility in the first instance to see that their child is educated and the parent will be held responsible for proper use of that money.

     

    3  Devolution In Practice – Why should a central government operate a near-monopoly service when those closest to the action can best administer and manage?

     

    4  Citizens As Self-Determining, Self-Sufficient  – Even as public monies are used for the purpose of a well-educated public, the aggregate effect of assorted independent efforts are just as likely, economically, to produce as good results as something organized from afar.  This leads to self-reliance rather than dependency on the state. 

     

    5  Diversity, Not One-Size-Fits-All – Parents can choose from choices already available (tutoring, independent schools, on-line service, etc.) or help in developing new schools, free schools, or other learning networks.  Customizing as necessary for special needs of the student can be encouraged.

     

    6  Innovation – There is a great stimulus for innovation and entrepreneurship once money is freed up. The government and public at large should be very pleased when modernization and experimentation is initiated at the grassroots level rather than by bureaucrats top-down.

     

    7  Political Principle Of People Having A Voice In Decisions That Affect Them Is Put Into Practice – Parents should be genuinely included in decision-making about their children and their prudent use of the $40 day will likely meet the trust placed on them.   The book by Seymour Sarason — Parental Involvement and the Political Principle — goes so far as to propose abolishing the existing governance system that deters parents. Pasi Salhberg, a leading international speaker on behalf of the Finnish Model of Education says that in a group of 10 discussing education policies only one should be a teacher, and that parents should be involved. 
    http://eltorofulbright.blogspot.com/2013/05/my-interview-with-pasi-sahlberg.html

     

    The distribution to parents of pre-teens of the education dollar at the rate of $40 day, in the aggregate, would likely produce exemplary results at least equal to the present centralized program. 


  2. Education Savings Accounts – It’s About Time !

    May 20, 2014 by Tunya

    Ontario Provincial Election — ESAs On Tap

    So far — the Ontario provincial election with just three weeks to go — has seen little said about the dismal education picture. The teacher unions and public service unions seem to have a lot at stake in this election and they do have a lot more to say than the major parties about their hopes and expectations in their industry: public education.  They are pouring considerable resources ($, spin & volunteers) into this critical election.

    School boards in the public school sector also have a lot at stake, and are planning a provincial EDUCATION DAY, May 27, when they plan to quiz candidates in all 107 ridings about education issues.  The OPSBA says they are “non-partisan” yet they are limiting participation to only 4 major parties (Lib, NDP, PC, Gr) – BUT there are more parties running, especially the Libertarian Party which aims to have candidates for all ridings. Will the OPSBA be fair?
    http://www.opsba.org/index.php?q=advocacy_and_action/EducationDay

    For parents and grandparents and guardians this election should be a prime opportunity to talk about education issues — choice, innovations, technology, reading priorities, reading failures, fuzzy math, special needs, genuine parent involvement, teacher recertification, assessments, accountability, 21st Century curriculum, basic skills, etc.  What’s happening so far regarding parent concerns?

    This election provides a cosmological opportunity to talk about Education Savings Accounts (ESA), a fantastic new way to get responsive education — responsive to the needs of students rather than industry dependents.  40 years ago home education became the rare opening for parents to take charge of their children’s’ education.  Now, choice mechanisms have evolved to the stage where the one-best-choice approach is undoubtedly the ESA.  The idea needs push from long-suffering citizens, from those fed up with “producer capture”, from those fatigued and frustrated with “pent-up demand”, appalled with political coercion, sick of put-downs, stone-walling, dumbing-down, excuses, excuses, excuses, etc., etc., etc.

    Ontario Election — June 12, 2014

    Five Major Political Parties Running for your Vote — Liberal, NDP, Progressive Conservative, Green and Libertarian

    107 Constituencies — The FIVE main parties expect to have candidates in each riding.

    Here are the links to their platforms:  SEARCH for “education”.

    Liberal — http://www.ontarioliberal.ca/  [see 2014 budget and search for “education”http://www.ontarioliberal.ca/newsblog/NewsDetails.aspx?id=Budget+2014+-+Building+Opportunity,+Securing+Our+Future ]

    NDP — http://www.ontariondp.ca/?COLLCC=3484805252& [see – Issues]

    PC — http://www.ontariopc.com/ [see platform http://ontariopc.com/millionjobsplan/plan.pdf ]

    Green — http://www.gpo.ca/  [ see platformhttp://www.gpo.ca/sites/gpo.ca/files/attachments/gpo_platform_2014_05_13_web.pdf  SEARCH for “education”]

    Libertarian — http://www.libertarian.on.ca/  [see Education Platform http://libertarian.on.ca/2013-2014-platform/education-smarter-inspiring ]


  3. 21st Century Learning – Petitions, Reviews

    May 6, 2014 by Tunya

    Cults of Progressivism & Common Core Need Scrutiny

    Most of the Western World has been infected with force-fed education changes called “transformations”.

    In Canada we have Personalized Learning, Inspired Education, Achieving Excellence — all with the same template as Common Core and same narratives but with different titles. Internationally, and within UN agencies, these are seen as 21st Century Learning projects preparing students for career, college and citizenship.

    In England a new book is calling Progressivism to account. By Googling you will find many informative reviews for — Progressively Worse: The Burden of Bad Ideas in British Schools, by Robert Peal. Here is part of the foreword:https://teachingbattleground.wordpress.com/2014/04/28/progressively-worse-a-subversive-text/

    For many people uneasy about these 21st Century presumptuous education projects the most disturbing thing is the methods used to bring about compliance. Implementation is seen as coercive and stealthy. These transformations have not been justified by any demonstrated need nor grounded in evidence-based research. Many of the approaches are experimental with no protocols assuring safeguards to students. These methods to extract agreement are objectionable and not in keeping with democratic principles.

    Since many public teachers are guaranteed “autonomy” in selection of materials for lessons they can select from a wide range of materials that may very well be ideologically slanted. Or the teacher might be thus inclined anyway and search for compatible material. This is happening regarding the 21st Century Competency Goal of “critical thinking” which we might agree is desirable and needed. However, just simply checking for texts on Amazon without even going to textbook publishers one would be alarmed to find books on Critical Theory and Critical Pedagogy, many of which convey pure Marxist doctrine teaching social justice and who is oppressed and needs “emancipation”.

    I think our politicians are beginning to see how education of the young needs more information and oversight regarding this public service. Australia is already well into two reviews — into The National Curriculum and into Teacher Training. England has just announced a Review into Initial Teacher Training.

    [my comment on Education News today http://www.educationviews.org/sign-letter-common-core-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-356486

     

     


  4. Progressively Worse – a new book on Education

    May 5, 2014 by Tunya

    Disintegration Of Progressive Education House Of Cards Finally Happening

    Compare and contrast the specialized fields of education and medicine. 

    Ask the simple question:  Would the medical field allow an epidemic to start, take hold, spread, and NOT be challenged?  No. That would not be, and has never been, allowed to happen.  Everything in the structure of medicine screams against negligence of duty.

    On the other hand, what is our experience in the field of education?  Well, it’s been at least 50 years of  a steady spread of dumbing-down of vast populations due to the virus  of “progressivism”.  Many signals have appeared that pointed to danger.  The field is littered with reports and complaints but there has been little relief for long-suffering clients of this system.

    Two conditions account for this unchecked education epidemic.  Firstly: Ideological activists — well-fueled with articulate platforms and well-placed in zones of influence — have had a relatively free rein in advancing their progressive cause.  Secondly: Those in oversight have blindly (and compromisingly) allowed a one-size-fits-all mentality to embed itself into services that should be primarily guided by “best practice” and client consensual choice. 

    Radicalism and laxity are related.  Progressivism, under many guises, propagates and harms mass populations while a blind eye prevails on the part of school boards and government ministries.

    Well, there is good news regarding this raging epidemic hitherto allowed to flourish. While radicalism is growing fiercer, faster and more presuming at least we are seeing some influential resistance gearing up.

    1   While each new expose seems to promise reform, finally, this book — Progressively Worse — is likely to encourage the opening of a lot of floodgates. Not only releasing pent-up-demand for reform, but actually helping focus on root causes. The 50 year chronology of UK progressivism’s growth is equally applicable to Canada, USA, Australia, New Zealand and other nations. http://www.learningspy.co.uk/featured/progressively-worse-review/

    The UK Education Minister, Michael Gove, has just announced an independent Review into ITT (Initial Teacher Training).

    2    Australia has two Reviews going into “root” issues: Review of the National Curriculum and Review of Teacher Training. 

    3   Alberta (the “tall poppy” that had to be cut down) has just released a report of the Task Force For Teaching Excellence http://www.edmontonjournal.com/news/edmonton/Task+force+report+politcally+driven+assault+teachers/9808600/story.html

    4   The curriculum wars have been ongoing for many decades, to the point where two main camps now predominate — traditionalists vs progressives. The traditionalist camp believes in tolerance, live and let live, consent and choice, whereas the progressive camp believes in one-size-fits-all, paternalistic “we know best” and stealth incrementalism.  One side is for freedom, the other for totalitarianism.  My reading of the balance at the moment is that progressives, because of methods used and lack of oversight, have “captured” the field by a ratio of 9 to 1.  A good article to start understanding the two camps and current “Common Core” debates in the US is here http://www.hoover.org/publications/defining-ideas/article/171441

    Of course, the more parents and public get involved, greater likelihood that lax and gutless political entities will have to respond — with genuine and accountable programs.

    [posted on Society for Quality Education (SQE) http://www.societyforqualityeducation.org/index.php/blog/read/progressively-worse ]

     

     

     


  5. Education for self-sufficiency

    April 1, 2014 by Tunya

    Education For Self-Sufficiency

    Every year, in our neighborhood, I see the same pattern repeat itself — the pair of crows raise a chick or two that eventually seem to disappear into self-sufficiency (I hope) — the mother skunk has her babes that also seem to disappear into self-sufficiency (I hope). The fact is, I see these same parents start afresh every new year. The parents have brought up their young to such a point for them to be free on their own.

    Janet Lane, in this well-argued article, also hopes that our children will eventually “move out of the basement” — to self-sufficiency (we hope). The point of her article is that education should be realistic enough to help place students eventually into

    gainful employment, thus, why not have business provide input into school curriculum? Many jobs will come from the private sector.

    So should students also learn about entrepreneurial, charity, environmental, public service and hosts of other occupations as well as continuing in post secondary education for professions?

    How this is to be done may, however, need more ideas than just the school visits by representatives of job fields and counsellors. I have an idea, which would also add the needed dimension of “critical thinking” that Janet Lane also mentions as a

    requirement for future jobs.

    Also critics would be part of the action and provide their input.

    I propose the development of texts and curriculum to provide Opposing Viewpoints. This is a double-barrelled approach whereby students not only learn opposing viewpoints on a topic but also learn to identify propaganda techniques.

    I have in front of me — Zoos, an Opposing Juniors Viewpoints book. Students learn the techniques of slanted words and phrases, scare tactics and the difference between sound reasoning vs propaganda. Viewpoints are presented — I like zoos, I hate zoos — Zoos provide wholesome entertainment, Zoos exploit animals for entertainment, etc.

    It would be great to use this approach to learn about the pros and cons of the oil industry, for example, or any other employment related topic. But instead of one author as in the Zoos book, spokespersons for different viewpoints would present, with an overall editor examining the presentation/propaganda strategies used.

    I like this approach to critical thinking using real examples. Is this a good idea?

     

    [published in National Post, 31 March, 2014 re opinion piece by Janet Lane, A Place for Business in the Classroom http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2014/03/31/janet-lane-a-place-for-business-in-the-classroom/http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2014/03/31/janet-lane-a-place-for-business-in-the-classroom/