RSS Feed

‘GOOD NEWS’ Category

  1. parent rights in legislation – utah

    February 28, 2014 by Tunya

    From The Salt Lake Tribune, Feb 27, 2014

    http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/57607959-78/bill-parents-child-reasonable.html.csp

    Lawmakers advance ‘bill of rights’ for Utah parents – SB122

    Parents would have what amounts to a bill of rights in education under legislation forwarded to the full Senate on Thursday.

    SB122, sponsored by Sen. Aaron Osmond, R-South Jordan, list the rights parents have when dealing with schools, including some new rights.

    The bill aims to reengage parents who aren’t involved in their children’s education as well as those who have been shut out by educators, Osmond said.

    He wants an education system, he said, that recognizes "the parent really is the lead" and that will customize education to get the best outcomes for students . . .

    The version endorsed Thursday requires that schools make reasonable accommodations to let parents influence which teacher the child gets; visit classrooms; excuse a child’s absences; set the child’s level of academic rigor; excuse a child from statewide or national standardized tests; secure course credit if a child tests out or is competent in a subject; set the time for a parent-teacher conference; and be notified if a child violates discipline or conduct rules.


  2. Shortcuts To teacher training – australia

    February 27, 2014 by Tunya

    Teach for Amereica is a successful program that prepares university grads for teaching — in six intensive weeks.

    After six weeks of training at the University of Melbourne, TFA (Australia) program graduates teachers for two years teaching in disadvantaged schools that serve students from low socio-economic backgrounds. About half teach in the high demand STEM subjects, as many are recent graduates themselves with specialist degrees.

    Here is today’s news, Jan 15, 2014: On a fast-track to a career in education

     http://www.smh.com.au/national/education/on-a-fasttrack-to-a-career-in-education-20140115-30txf.html

    The TFA program will no doubt be an item in the Review just started by the new government of Tony Abbott.  Part of the reason his Liberal/National Coalition won the last Australian election over the governing Labor regime was public disaffection with a new National Curriculum — six years in the making — with a worldview that was considered “leftist”, “New Age” and full of “gobbledygook”.  [I guess that’s Australian for our “edu-babble”.]

    Australia, like Canada, has also been sliding in international education scores, so the Review will look at curriculum as well as teaching capacities.  Parents will have a say in the Review process.  Nick Cater, a respected culture critic, says the curriculum is “beyond saving”.  He disapproves of the “sustainability” agenda being “integrated” into all subjects — English, geography, history, mathematics, science — for example. 

    Cater says: “If the Education Minister is to be criticised, it is for imagining this irredeemable document can be tidied up and put back on the shelf when the only realistic course of action is to tear the damn thing up.”

    Australia is a rather bi-polarized nation, thus it will be a lively time as the Review Duo is to report back in six months time.

    I will be watching for these issues to be deliberated — Why a “national” curriculum at all when states are responsible for education? —  Should public funding be freed-up for a wider diversity of alternatives? — Will teacher training be critiqued for its role in mindsets and standards? — Should one worldview predominate or would a pluralist nation benefit from a live-and-let-live broadmindedness?


  3. Family Right to Education Choice #1

    February 20, 2014 by Tunya

    For a copy of Parent Rights in the Education of Their Children see:  http://genuine-education-reform-today.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/PARENT_RIGHTS.pdf
     
    The rights compiled here are those that generally apply in most democratic countries. They have been gathered from sources in Canada, United States, England, and Australia. Some of these rights are self-evident, some are inscribed in law. Others are simply standards which parents have grown to expect when good educational practice is followed.
     
    1. THE RIGHT TO CHOICE
     

    “Parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their children.” (Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948)

     
    This means, that while parents have a duty to see that their children are educated to a reasonable level of self-sufficiency and citizenship, they can choose how this is to be accomplished: public, private or church schools, tutoring, correspondence courses, home study, or other styles. If a style other than a public school is chosen and the parents are challenged, the onus is generally on the state to demonstrate that the child is not being educated at a level equal to his peers in a public school. The mandate of the public schools is to make available to all children in the community an education which is free, appropriate and equal. Parents have a right to choose and expect at least that minimum for their child.
     
    Added notes, Jeb 20, 2014
    Those words above were written in 1975 when a group of parents sat down to gather and codify parents rights.  Much os what was written then undoubtedly apples today — with revisions or additions necessary to meet current times, especially concerning the ubiquitous presence of technology.
     
    HOWEVER:  On this topic of choice and parents as consumers/ clients, customers of the education system, I am ever watchful that some are trying to recast parental primary role into a more incidental support role.  Progressives generally quote the UN Rights of the Child and forget the UN Declaration of Human Rights when talking about children.
     
    Other progressives want to define "students" as the customers, and teachers as "oin loco parentis.
     
    Still others insist that the learners are "students and teachers" together.
     
    All these attempts at watering down the primary family responsibility in education need watching and challenging. 
     

  4. Bringing The Topic Of “ESA” To Canada

    February 13, 2014 by Tunya

    Education Savings Accounts (ESAs) is an important concept that is gaining traction in the United States.  Jay P Greene's blog has a number of posts on the topic and is within the broader CHOICE category.

    http://jaypgreene.com/2014/02/13/mississippi-senate-and-house-send-pass-esa-bills/

    I just posted to this blog the following:

    Bringing The Topic Of ESAs To Canada

    We’ve had a running conflict between teacher union and government in our province of British Columbia, Canada, for over 40 years. The latest “event” is the judgment handed down by Supreme Court that found the government to be acting in “bad faith” in bargaining, provoking a strike, and was handed a $2Million fine.  It’s more complex, but that’s the general picture.  Of course, there’s an Appeal.  (Search words — BCTF government judgment — will bring in some stories if you’re interested.)

    Today I submitted the following letter-to-the-editor so that we might hopefully vault over these problems and consider alternatives, including ESAs.

    “The patience of parents and public alike has been sorely tested by the endless conflicts between the teachers’ union and the government.

    What we fail to remember is that these struggles have been going on for over 40 years, not the 12-year period recently highlighted by the recent BC Supreme Court decision (BCTF vs BC, 2014).  Furthermore, this happens regardless of the political stripe of the government of the day — be it Social Credit, NDP or Liberal.

    This is a power struggle that may never be sorted out. Legal actions bankrupt resources. Students are shortchanged.  And parents, who are ultimately responsible for their children’s education, are left unsure, frustrated and unable to pursue their children’s best interests.

    Much of the problem rests with the service model adopted to ensure an educated public.  The mistake is to consider education as a public utility that only a government monopoly can provide.  The predictable happens — special interests vie for control and interfere with the intended mission.

    However, if the common good of appropriately educated students is to be served, why not seek alternative models to deliver the desired outcomes?

    Even now, economists are warning that many school graduates are not meeting career or college expectations. But so much is known about what works in education and much more can be achieved with greater innovation, flexibility and stability. 

    Why not release the public education dollar and have it follow the student?  Charter schools are working elsewhere.  Education Savings Accounts are being used in some US states for parents to shop and mix-and-match education choices for their kids. In particular, special needs and talents are better served in this manner. 

    This current impasse provides a great opportunity to try different ways to help our kids and grandkids get the education they need for the 21st Century. “


  5. Parent Rights Transparent and Enshrined in law

    February 12, 2014 by Tunya

    Yes, parents have rights in the education of their children.  A few people may mutter: "But they have duties too."  What I have found is that those in the know, or on the inside circles in education do know AND ENJOY these rights.  But, they are not written down.  This is unfair for the usually shy, trusting parents who first start seeing the need to advocate.

    After a nearly half century of promoting parent rights there may finally be some breakthroughs to make parent rights more transparent.  They need not be chiselled in stone on the townhall wall, but they should be prominent — on the school walls, library bulletin boards, in the students' daybooks etc.  

    Yesterday I read about Idaho, and sent this comment:

    http://www.idahoednews.org/news/house-introduces-parents-bill-of-rights/#comment-188391

    Transparent Parent Rights Long Overdue

    Yes, many of the rights proposed are already there. But few parents really feel welcome in asserting them, even if they are well informed. Those who really benefit and enjoy their rights are usually parents in the professions, not your everyday parent. That is unfair. That is why this bill is a breakthrough and hopefully — eventually — these rights will be posted in all schools, hospitals, day care centers, government offices, etc.

    What I would suggest, however, is that a working committee do more exploratory work on widening some of the rights, especially in education. With the Common Core Curriculum concerns being expressed it seems that parents have been quite excluded from what is being proposed.

    I would suggest a look at this document that we compiled over 30 years ago when fads and experiments were the rage. http://genuine-education-reform-today.org/2010/04/06/parent-rights-and-their-childrens-education/

    PS: I am from Canada. I wish you the best in this endeavour.

    Today, I gained news of California's concrete proposals, based on research, to advance the parent cause.

    This link to the 15pg report http://edsource.org/today/wp-content/uploads/Power-of-Parents-Feb-2014.pdf?utm_source=Parent-power+release+email+&utm_campaign=Parent+Power+Report+Release&utm_medium=email

    I like this priority: "schools will be assessed as to how successful they are in working with parents.'

    More later about California.