RSS Feed

‘Obstacles’ Category

  1. Methods Matter – Phonics

    January 25, 2016 by Tunya

    Methods Matter

    1 Reading in schools is mainly treated in one or other of two ways: (a) a skill or tool to be acquired to enable further learning or (b) a social practice — a worldview — to be applied throughout the educational experience from pre-K to college.

    2 Phonics is the method by which the skill in (a) above is acquired. Whole-language and various other whole word practices — (b) above — do not “teach” as such but expect students to gain literacy by both memorizing lists of words and guessing others from the context of what they are reading. Whole-language is banned in Germany after being tried in the 80s and declared bad practice.

    3 Direct Instruction is a general term for the explicit teaching of a skill-set using demonstrations of the material, rather than exploratory models such as inquiry-based learning. (Wikipedia) Phonics is the method described above and Whole-language is the second.

    4 Why were we never told the value of these things for children? The public and parents have generally been kept ignorant of the Reading Wars that have raged within education systems for over 100 years. A split started in the early 1900s after John Dewey’s essay — The Primary Education Fetish — gained popularity when learning by “doing” (inquiry) started to supersede “drill” (direct instruction). Philosophic, political and corporate profit-making helped keep this contest internal.

    5 Oh, we were? Yes, people did get a flavor of the division and the harms that children experienced. Illiteracy rates did not decrease satisfactorily and the sensational book — Why Johnny Can’t Read, 1955, Flesch — caused considerable debate. But, like water off a duck’s back, little of lasting importance transpired over the last century. The practice of teaching claims “professional autonomy” is a sacred trust and behind closed doors teachers choose their methods according to their inner lights. Currently, there is a mish mash of various styles and combinations of methods — no real standard practice as any other profession adheres to.

    6 Didn’t know that! You DO know all that, Will Fitzhugh! And, much, much more, besides. Thanks for being provocative in trying to stimulate some shame and action in this neglected disservice to children. Hopefully others can bring us up to date on the state of Reading in our 21st C world. I do hear of a promising development that in England the Reading Reform Foundation (RRF) has reconstituted into IFERI — International Foundation for Effective Reading Instruction and is promoting international use of the Year One Phonics Screening Check — http://www.iferi.org/resources-and-guidance/

     

    [posted to Education Consumer Clearinghouse — Will Fitzhugh asks “innocent questions” ]
     


  2. Public Education Fraud – Chapter 2

    January 17, 2016 by Tunya

    Is Public Education A Fraud? — Chapter Two — A Professor’s Doubts

    Here is a skeptical professor who speaks out about our new curriculum in BC. What he says applies substantially to the rest of Canada, US with its Common Core problems, and anywhere else in the world that is facing “21st Century Transformations”. He feels students will find “the whole exercise is pointless.”

    Here is Prof David Livingstone’s Opinion Piece in the Vancouver Sun yesterday with the title — BC kids guinea pigs in dubious public school experiment. The title is different in the online story — Brave New World is in the title — http://www.vancouversun.com/opinion/editorials/opinion+revised+public+school+curriculum+preparing/11655627/story.html

    “ . . . few parents I have talked with know their children are about to become the subjects in a very ambitious social experiment based on some questionable hypotheses.”

    “The new curriculum is designed for the “21st century learner” for whom, we are told by the Ministry of Education, learning facts will become less important.”

    Dr Livingstone is correct in noting that parents are largely unaware. On top of this “the system” itself is going into uncharted territory. And “personalized learning” in its fullest implementation opens up serious questions of privacy, womb-to-tomb data collection and social engineering suspicions.

    Human experimentation should have strict protocols in place to protect subjects — especially young children who are yet unable to stand up for themselves.

    I think this expose by Dr Livingstone is a good time to start developing a consciousness about the harm that can occur when radically new, untested and unproven, techniques are to be used in teaching and learning. Parents need written safeguards against which they can check whether their full permission should be granted to have their children participate. Example: The program has qualified, well-prepared personnel. The program is supported by research with supporting references. Parents are part of the feedback and evaluation of the new program.

    I haven’t seen any such safeguards enunciated anywhere in these sweeping international education “transformations” and “paradigm shifts”. I think these illuminating observations by Dr Livingstone could be the spur to develop statements about the rights and responsibilities of those involved in the education of young children.


  3. Public Education Fraud – Chapter 1

    January 16, 2016 by Tunya

    Is Public Education A Fraud? — Chapter One — Teacher Activism

    A mother writes that she feels lucky when it comes to her children’s education. After considerable struggle and effort “My son was lucky. He got the help he needed . . . “ The implication throughout her long story is that responsiveness to students is a matter of luck and parent’s persistence. Other students are left behind.

    Her son is now inspired to learn — but what is he learning? So much of current 21st Century Learning is all about learning to work together — demonstrating competencies of collaboration, communication, cooperation. But mastery of the individual tools (hard skills) of learning — reading, math, and scientific method — are not a priority anymore.

    Please note that the hard skills — the legendary 3Rs — are measurable. Emphasis on “competencies”, which are just a teacher’s subjective opinion on a checklist are “nice” but not what kids are sent to school for. The school system’s unilateral “transformation” to competencies without public consent is seen as an avoidance of accountability. Is this not a trick, sleight of hand, a fraud?

    Parents want some certainty when they send their children to school and that is why this parent says greater choices are needed so that a good fit can be had. Education should not be a matter of luck or a lottery as in some cases in the United States.

    But, there are obstacles to choices. This mother points out that the one-size-fits-all public school model and the requirements of unions are obstacles. Let me draw your attention to another, behind-the-scenes major influence in this matter and it is the teacher training institutions.

    The ACDE, an organization of the Deans of Education in Canada, has adopted principles in the training of teachers, not just for pedagogic purposes but also for political activism. An Accord signed in 2005 states as one of its 12 principles:

    • An effective initial teacher education program encourages teachers to assume a social and political leadership role.

    In the Fall 2006 “Education Canada” journal, Rob Tierney and Alice Collins say: “The twelve principles advance values and ideals about the teacher as professional, life long learner and social activist.” Tierney was Dean of Education, UBC, at that time.

    In the ACDE General Accord they mention one of their goals being “to create a public discourse around the shaping of Canadian society and the crucial role of public education.” To do this they relate to governments and other organizations including national and provincial teachers’ associations. In addition, signatories “advocate for increased public funding.” http://www.csse-scee.ca/acde/accords

    Also troubling is this statement: “Those signing the General Accord become part of a network with shared commitments and values relative to education and are contributing to national, public discourse on the importance of public education in developing and sustaining a civil society.”

    I thought we already had a “civil society” in Canada ! Or is something else in mind?

    Kenneth A Strike who wrote a number of books about ethics and education writes in his book “Liberal Justice and the Marxist Critique” that these two philosophies are in constant conflict in our education systems. “Marxists are likely to see schools as sites of class conflict . . . part of the Marxist theoretical hard core . . .” Liberals are “capable of free choice, and their choices command the respect due to the choices of free agents.”

    I prefer the Liberal project versus the Marxist agitation. Which other profession (doctors, engineers, accountants, pharmacists, etc.) train professionals to be social and political activists? Just another aspect of the fraud.


  4. Dumbing-down adult education too?

    December 5, 2015 by Tunya

    TIME TO DUMB-DOWN THE ADULTS TOO

    Story: ONTARIO – $9M more for Adult Education

    I have notes for this story, but it will take me days to weave it together . . .

    1 Big adult education lobby needing jobs, consultancies, more venues for pet theories

    2 Much Adult Ed has a decided Whole-Language approach, holistic, social justice oriented

    3 Refugees, young and old, should learn the Whole-Language way (not phonics) to fit into rest of society.

    4 Grade 6 Reading Level is ideal. Propaganda theory claims this as best to keep a democracy in line.

    5 With new Liberal government in Federal politics, more $ will be available for adult education and refugee settlement. Maybe even Canadian Council on Learning will be restored, axed by Harper. This is just priming the pump; besides, it’s a model for others.

    6 The international 21st Century Learning and workforce development plans are being well organized. ON needs to stay with the flow. Story: Nov 2013 – Wynne says ON needs to move beyond 3Rs, to “creativity, collaboration, community and critical thinking”.

    7 What’s the use to keep bringing forth these absurdities? Outraged citizens certainly don’t count. Why, NOTHING works to counter bad government. Even the voice of reason and vast amounts of data and proof of waste and corruption do little to sway governments. Look at these three latest reports from Attorneys General:

    ONTARIO: http://news.nationalpost.com/full-comment/robyn-urback-auditor-general-report-confirms-whats-wrong-with-ontarios-liberals-everything
    Dec ’15 “ . . . The breadth of mismanagement detailed in those 770 pages . . . is sloughed off as business as usual . . . Each mess-up is competing for airtime, so none of them gets their due. Perhaps that’s why this government seems to think itself “invincible.”

    NOVA SCOTIA: http://thechronicleherald.ca/opinion/1324678-bennett-do-over-overdue-for-muddled-education-system
    Nov ’15 – Paul Bennett’s take on the NS AG’s report: “Student performance data in the AG’s report confirm that it continues to be mediocre at best. One out of three students overall is failing to meet the ‘provincial standard’ in Grades 3, 4 and 6 literacy and mathematics … It may be time to turn the system upside down with major structural reforms that ensure a more effective and democratically accountable school system.”

    BC: http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/aboriginal-students-face-racism-of-low-expectations-in-b-c-schools
    Nov ’15 AG’s report “ . . . found a “racism of low expectations” in B.C. public schools . . . Aboriginal students’ high school graduation rate is just 62 per cent, compared to 87 per cent for non-aboriginal students in the province.”

    This lack of accountability is appalling. Caring citizens just shake their heads in sorrow.


  5. slinking away from accountability in Education

    December 2, 2015 by Tunya

     

    Accountability in Education — The Missing Link

    There is a big difference between SUBJECTIVE and OBJECTIVE ratings — be it rating of bridges or teachers or even pencils. Do they do the job they were produced to do?

    There is a big difference between feeling/looking nice and actually producing a demonstrable result.

    For teachers to be judged subjectively, “probably by their own peers”, as the New York story conveys, is not good enough. Teachers rated “effective” are not necessarily able to bring forth students who read or do math at grade level. http://www.activistpost.com/2015/12/the-fall-of-america-signals-the-rise-of-the-new-world-order.html?utm_source=Activist+Post+Subscribers&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=f034b7162c-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_term=0_b0c7fb76bd-f034b7162c-369048093

    Not so in Australia — if their plan for producing effective teachers goes ahead.

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-12-01/around-one-in-ten-teaching-students-fail-literacy-and-numeracy-/6988168

    The news from Australia is that teacher training is now under the glass. Numeracy and literacy proficiency is expected from newly trained teachers and they are to be screened and tested. The full plan is yet to be implemented, but a trial run with 5000 trainees shows that 10% of trainees did not pass. Upon full implementation, these candidates would not receive teaching certificates.

    What is dismaying is not only what’s going on in Canada or New York but from the very head of the venerable PISA measurements (Program for International Student Assessment). Andreas Schleicher, in a foreword to a recent OECD publication — Schooling Redesigned: Toward Innovative Learning Systems — says:

    “Some will call for a robust scientific evidence base . . . to distinguish what is truly innovative and effective from what is simply different . . .The report therefore avoids references to “proven” or “best” practices.” (Pg 3-5 http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/education/schooling-redesigned_9789264245914-en#page6 )

    Please read just these three pages (3-5) and see if you discern any commitment from the PISA chief to continuing to provide hard measures about education performance and accountability.

     

    [To SQE Dec 02, 2015]