RSS Feed

‘Opinions in media’ Category

  1. Reply to Student Re Teacher Strike

    August 26, 2014 by Tunya

    [In a Teacher Strike it is ultimately the students who are the victims.  It’s great when students can research the issues and come up with an analysis, which can be put down for others to see.  Armand Birk, a university student, had his first published piece in the Huffington Post — For Every Student, There Was A Teacher — http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/armand-birk/bc-teachers-strike-students_b_5703501.html?utm_hp_ref=canada-british-columbia  Aug 24 ’14  After many comments and lively discussion Armand then asked: “Do you believe that the situation at hand would have been so dire if these issues had been fully addressed when they originally arose 12 or so years ago? . .  What are your thoughts?”  Below is my response and would love to hear back.]

    GOVERNANCE VERSUS IDEOLOGY FRAMES THE PRESENT SCHOOL STRIKE

    Armand: After publishing your excellent tribute to teachers you are now probing the larger picture, one of policy and financial management.

    Firstly, let me say that I, as parent and grandparent, do agree that relationships between teachers and their students can be precious and should be valued. But that is not what the current struggle is about.

    Now you ask if things would be different today if proper decisions were made 12 years ago. 

    But, that is not what is informing the two sides — the government and the teacher union — during their secret negotiations. They are immersed in age-old divisions that go back at least 40 years and well documented in the book Worlds Apart: BC Schools, Politics & Labour Relations Before & After 1972, Thomas Fleming (Bendall Bks, 2011). 

    This is key to understanding this “Hatfield/McCoy Feud” being played out today in BC. The closing paragraph of Fleming’s book (3 yrs ago!) said prophetically: “ . . .will government and the teachers’ federation finally find ways to behave in a civilized manner, or will the discord of recent decades finally weaken support for old organizational relationships to the point that a new ‘post-public’ universe of schooling will emerge?” 

    All members of the bargaining teams are well-aware of this 40 year feud and probably have well-thumbed copies of Worlds Apart in their briefcases. To read an article online of this issue go straight to the section “teacher power” http://historicalstudiesineducation.ca/index.php/edu_hse-rhe/article/view/454/611

    You will see how teacher union members, though not directly through BCTF, were instrumental in defeating the government and bringing in the first NDP government in BC. You will read how the BCTF president, “radical Marxist” Jim MacFarlan (misspelled McFarlan in article) “believed schools should be used as instruments of social change”. History records that BC governments of every stripe — socialist, liberal, conservative — struggled with this militant union ever since.

    You ask good questions, but I stress the issues go far beyond 12 years of history. The issues relate to ideology, that is, political agendas and you will find the politics of the inner BCTF circle (Yes, some still there from ’72) are off the continuum of local everyday politics in BC. The current strike rallying cry — As Long As It Takes — is part of the narrative from this extreme left website whose logo proclaims — Agitate, Educate, Organize http://rankandfile.ca/2014/06/28/bc-teachers-keep-your-eyes-on-the-prize/

    [In a Teacher Strike, students are the ultimate victims, so it's great when students actually research, then place their analysis down for others. Here is a university student, Armand Birk, who had his first published article in Huffington Post — For Every Student, There Was A Teacher, Aug 24 '14  http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/armand-birk/bc-teachers-strike-students_b_5703501.html?utm_hp_ref=canada-british-columbia  After many comments, Armand then asked: "Do you believe that the situation at hand would have been so dire if these issues had been fully addressed when they originally arose 12 or so years ago? . . . What are your thoughts?"  My answer below, and would love to hear back!]

    In case you didn’t know, we have TWO School Acts in BC. The Independent Schools Act, which forbids sedition — fostering discontent and overthrow of government, and the BC School Act, which says nothing about sedition. It’s too bad that besides all the active and unconcealed acts of rebelliousness being demonstrated, we now have the BCTF president, Jim Iker, urging members to actively swamp school board elections this Fall. (Lay control?)

    Armand: I appreciate your well-meaning questions and answer from a history that I've lived through. We learned that a military defense system should not be governed by the soldiers and understood education should not be run by teachers. Pasi Sahlberg, the highly revered speaker on behalf of Finnish education and its achievements also believes teachers should not dominate decision-making. http://eltorofulbright.blogspot.com/2013/05/my-interview-with-pasi-sahlberg.html

    Armand: Who manages the education system is probably the biggest issue of the current quarrel, not finances. I hope you’re thinking of going into public administration studies at University. Best wishes.

     

     


  2. Governance Failure in Public Education — Admitted

    August 22, 2014 by Tunya

    [posted to The Province comments, 20140821 on “The disgraceful truth about school dispute, Mike Smyth]

     

    Parents As A THIRD FORCE In BC Education

     

    Because this latest teacher strike befell at some of the most inconvenient times for students and their first responder advocates — their parents — a lot of penetrating questions have been raised. Firstly the graduates were tripped up in June.  Now, it is parents who are without any certainty as School Start looms with little hope of September days.  On top of that, taxpayers are grousing for rebates of school taxes.

     

    The biggest question, of course, is: Why has this turmoil been allowed to happen so frequently for 40 years?  Is it truly governance failure — by governments of various stripes be they socialist, conservative or liberal — buckling to demands of a public sector union for the sake of “labor peace”?

     

    The Minister of Education says that the dysfunctional paradigm of legislated “return to work” orders has to be broken — that he wants a negotiated settlement — that parents have told him they too want a negotiated settlement. 

     

    That parents are being brought into the picture in concrete ways is a real breakthrough — finally, the true “owners” of the educational responsibility are getting some recognition.  The $40 day payout to parents if the strike continues is verification of their obligation to see that education of their children happens.  Even if they have to do it themselves through home education, tutoring or finding other learning opportunities.  The parent info website is also another outreach to help parents find alternatives and keep them abreast of developments.

     

    This would not have happened if the BC Confederation of Parent Advisory Councils had not been active.  They wanted a collective voice in matters educational in BC and wanted to support the rights of individual parents who want to play instrumental roles in their children’s education.

     

    It is this promised or inferred sharing in decision-making that is, however, making the education establishment nervous — teacher unions in particular, then some academics, then administrations and bureaucracies who like the status quo.  Assertive consumers are not welcome.  Thus we see that interminable school wars between the union and the government are NOT unwelcome.  In fact, the teacher union may even be seen as a convenient scapegoat by which the monopoly public service is kept relatively stable.

     

    Whatever happens in the end regarding this strike, this is an opportune time for parents to make sure that overtures for involvement go beyond lip-service.  Parent rights need to be enunciated and written down.  The concerns about special needs need to be wrestled down — audits re current spending, are there sufficient teachers equipped to teach appropriately?; are parents able to access resources in a timely manner?; etc.  

     

    And let’s face it, teachers and education system. Parents do want their children to read proficiently.  When will there be a sincere commitment to this goal for all students?  The basics are foremost in parent minds if the system would only listen.  Accountability is something parents and taxpayers want assurances about.

     

    In a democracy those most affected are supposed to be involved.  Time to cut parents into the front lines of decision-making.

     

    This Third Force in the education picture in BC is a most welcome event.  Let’s build on it! 

     

     


  3. Education Debit Accounts – setting the scene

    August 2, 2014 by Tunya

     

    Brilliant — 1st Step To Deschooling Society

    Ivan Illich (1926-2002) wrote the book “Deschooling Society” in 1971. He was concerned that institutionalized schooling led to institutionalized society. He proposed learning webs instead.

    Please see all the sayings of Ivan Illich on twitter —https://twitter.com/IvanIllich2

    People believe in universal education, but that doesn’t have to be delivered by the state or unionized state workers. What is significant in 2014 versus the olden days is that the public is willing to pay taxes for an educated citizenry. That money need not go to institutions called public schools. It can go to the customer (parents & students) to find the best services they can for their particular needs.

    A brilliant opportunity now arises from our Teacher Strike. The government is to pay parents of children 12 and under $40 a day for day care or educational services. Parents could very well use that money for tutoring services in the basics. Or they, and perhaps teachers, can form learning pods where students can be taught, using technology and tested teaching methods.

    Here are some ideas, as far back as 1971, that Illich had for Learning Networks:

    http://www.wikiwand.com/en/Deschooling_Society

    In the long run, this model of learning can very well be translated into full-blown Education Debit Cards where each qualified student and parents could access the best services available. Arizona already has Education Savings Accounts for special needs students. We can start researching how such accounts can be used and regulated in BC during this test period.

    ____________

     

    2nd comment

    FREE SCHOOLS — Turning Crisis Into Opportunity

    What’s to stop a burst of innovation and versatility due to the shutdown of government schools? Don’t young people still need an education?

    The old standby for home educators, if they had no other plan or program, was simply to follow the syllabus. This is the carefully prepared Typical Course of Study of the World Book encyclopedia people. Every level, from Preschool to Grade 12, is here.http://worldbook.com/typical-course-of-study

    The outlines for BC curriculum are also available from Ministry website. Correspondence courses also available.

    $40 a day per student can easily initiate learning pods operated by either parents or teachers or both. Used textbooks are easily available from online used book outfits and delivery is quick. Online learning would also help meet the challenge. The possibilities are limitless.

    The Free Schools movement of the 60s had great passion and created hundreds of small independent schools without all the technology we now have.

    Go for it! Education is a continuous, developmentally urgent activity. It need not stop for a teacher strike and government lockout!

    Is anyone scoping out the possibilities — sites, notices, personnel, accountability & mission statement — yet?

    ________________________________

    My  3rd comment expands the opportunity presented for examing the proposed "transformational" curriculum beiung imposed without consent of the public and parents.
     

    21st Century Learning Under Challenge


    Three provinces in Canada have so far been pressured to embrace 21st Century Learning — a broad term for “transforming” whole systems toward shifting to “competencies” and squeezing out skills and content. Constructivism is the new “teaching” style — basically non-teaching — or discovery or child-centered inquiry.

    Gurus have travelled across the globe bringing in the principles and procedures for whole system change — similar to the Common Core initiatives in the United States where already major objections are raised by parents.


    In Canada we have BC with its Personalized Learning Plan ready to roll out. Ontario has a 21st Century initiative.


    But it is Alberta that’s worth watching. The same gurus travelled back and forth to develop Alberta’s plan — Inspiring Education. Of course, public was typically not involved.

    Why Alberta is important is that there is currently a contest amongst the ruling Conservative Party for a new leader. As the three rivals travel across the province, they are hearing about concerns and discontent from parents about these new plans. It’s gone so far that one candidate, Jim Prentice, has already “pledged to halt all major education curriculum overhauls under his premiership.” None of these concerns would have been exposed so forcefully if these politicians had not been glad-handing with the grassroots in their communities. The first voting is Sept 6.

    It’s too bad there is no similar opportunity in BC for parents to be examining our Personalized Learning Plan as it’s full of the same gobbledygook as Alberta’s plan. See http://www.bced.gov.bc.ca/irp/docs/def_xcurr_comps.pdf 

    That’s why, at $40 a day, parents should grab the chance to snag alternatives to what’s coming down the pike.


  4. Who Manages The Public Education System?

    July 6, 2014 by Tunya

     

    Vancouver SUN, Saturday, July 05, 2014, Freedom of association clashes with the puyblic purse    

    http://www.vancouversun.com/business/Education+trial+Freedom+association+clashes+with+public+purse/10001961/story.html

     
    Who Manages The Public Education System? — That’s The Issue   [comment Tunya Audain]

    As long as we still have the monopoly system — public schooling run by the government and produced by monopoly teacher union workers — we will continue to have turf problems.

    For the longest time now — like 40 years at least — the teacher union has been calling the shots on many issues and the feeling is that the government acquiesces in order to ensure “labour peace”. Governments of different political stripes — conservative, liberal, socialist — have all had tussles with the union.

    Hopefully, when the Appeal does go to the Supreme Court of Canada, 9 judges will determine who has the right and duty to govern and manage the public education system. 

    I found it very troubling indeed, upon reading the latest Griffin Judgment, that the government was seeming to be pleading to regain some management rights from the BCTF ! Was that a joke? Here is the sentence from page 19 referring to March 2011 bargaining: “The government had an additional mandate that it asked BCPSEA to achieve in bargaining, seeking concessions from BCTF in favour of greater management rights.”

    I also bring forward a statement from a BCTF newsletter in 1967 which explains their deep involvement in professional development: “It is claimed that we appear to be accepting naively responsibilities which properly belong to school boards and the Department of Education, and in which they are in default. So long as the BCTF is willing to carry the load, these members argue, the public authorities will continue to evade, or neglect their responsibilities.”

    So, do we blame an opportunistic union for appropriating management rights from those sleeping at the wheel?

    Yes, the case must go as far as it can to clarify who is to manage?

     
    —————
     
    Then my reply to continuing conversation
     

    International Connections Count In The Teacher Union Movement

    Even though the BCTF strongly proclaims that it is “non-partisan” that does not mean it is not political.  Actually, the leadership (successive executives and HQ staff) hold ideological positions off the tame BC spectrum of conservative-socialist range.

    Dr Tom Fleming in his book “Worlds Apart” positions the start of their political instrumentalism to 1972 when the teacher unionists helped bring in the first socialist government in BC and when BCTF President, Jim MacFarlan, “radical Marxist” held sway.

    The BCTF does not belong to the tame Canadian Teachers’ Federation; it belongs to the radical EI (Education International).   “Dare The School Build A New Social Order?” (Counts, 1932) is an enduring project of militant teacher unions (like the NUT, NEA, BCTF, etc.) in the social reconstruction mode. 

    No only is the government of the day their target for influence, so are the public and teachers in the field kept on continuous alert through sophisticated PR and annual manifestations (eg anti FSA campaigns).

    “Hard done by” may be just another affected sophisticated strategy in a “progressive” drive for “worker control of the workplace” and social change societally.  Who manages whom?  Who provokes whom?

    This is not idle, tin-foil-hat rambling.  The game plans of the BCTF have gained adoring acclaim in the labour relations literature.  Please see: Structuring reality so that the law will follow: British Columbia teachers' quest for collective bargaining rights    http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Structuring+reality+so+that+the+law+will+follow%3A+British+Columbia…-a0274699540

    Start with the Conclusion first:

    •  overwhelming onslaught of litigation
    •  an influential, media-savvy political force
    •  cultivating teacher support
    •   "restructure the reality" so that "the law would follow."

    Yes, the Appeal all the way to the Supreme Court of Canada (9 judges) will have some very interesting issues to sort through.


  5. Crafting the Servile Mind

    July 3, 2014 by Tunya

     

    Posted as comment on Jay P Greene blog, 20140703, Common Core Political Naivete and the Enemies List http://jaypgreene.com/2014/07/02/common-­‐core-­‐political-­‐naivete-­‐and-­‐the-­‐enemies-­‐list/

    Crafting The Servile Mind by Tunya Audain

    Common Core has its parallels in Canada, UK, Australia and New Zealand. 21st Century “transformation” of education is the common theme. The projected paradigm shifts are similar — from sage on the stage to guide on the side — from content to competency skills of collaboration, critical thinking, creativity and community. Students are to work in groups. Throw in social emotional learning (SEL) and social justice and you have it.

    (Australia is due soon to release the findings of two reviews probing the “transformations” in the national curriculum and teacher training.)

    Concerning the CC the expectations and intentions are declared, even before standards or measurement and accountability criteria have been developed/tested/validated.

    It’s not necessarily the intention that sticks out as “ugly”, it’s the “authoritarian” style that sticks out; and sticks in the craw of many. AND now triggers a sober second look at the intention itself.

    Authoritarianism demands obedience and submission. It’s the stealth and coercion in implementation on top of the imposing curriculum details that are causing the backfire — across the political spectrum.

    If lockstep agreement was really expected, then the designers have misread their audience. Not all constituencies are falling into line. This overconfident bloodless coup may very well prove to be a supreme “teaching moment” that we should be grateful for. I hope researchers can chronicle and analyze how this could have happened practically behind our backs. Just how servile were the adopters to be? Just how servile are the “career and college ready” graduates to be after 12 years of CC schooling?

    Kenneth Minogue in the Preface to the paperback issue of his book (2012), “The Servile Mind” said: “Only profound changes in human nature can make possible many versions of justice. The individualist must, as we have seen, give way to the comrade.”

    And, in the home education movement we had John Holt, fearing fascist leanings within public education, say in the 80s: “Today freedom has different enemies. It must be fought for in different ways. It will take very different qualities of mind and heart to save it.”