RSS Feed

‘Opinions in media’ Category

  1. Reporting To Parents Legally Essential

    June 6, 2014 by Tunya

    [My comment to Vancouver Sun, June 6, 2014, to story "Province moves to make exams, report cards essential services —  

    Application to LRB asks for ruling to prevent ‘serious and immediate danger’ to affected students"

     http://www.vancouversun.com/business/moves+make+exams+report+cards+essential+services/9916083/story.html#Comments }

    Of Course, Progress Report Cards To Parents Are An Essential Service !


    After all, it is the parents who are ultimately responsible for the education of their children. If parents have chosen to send their kid to a government school, then said government school has to keep parents informed — parents then can choose to stay, advocate for more services, get supplementary tutoring, or choose an independent school or home educate. That’s how parents make “informed decisions” in the best interests of their child.

     

    What happened in the last teacher strike in 2011-2012 school year was lamentable and illegal. Report cards were withheld or blank ones were sent home by mail. Those that were withheld had the LRB to thank for granting BCTF teachers permission to do so. Those school districts that sent home blank report cards felt they were following the letter of the law, bizarre as it was to do so — and costly.

    There are to be three formal written student progress reports.

    See Student Progress Report Order http://www.bced.gov.bc.ca/legislation/schoollaw/e/m191-94.pdf

     
     

     

     


  2. Public Sector Unions As Dictators

    June 3, 2014 by Tunya

    [The Globe & Mail reported that during this Ontario election campaign the Police Union took out ads opposing a political party that promised to decrease public service employees — http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-debate/the-police-get-political/article18952122/comments/#dashboard/follows/  My comment below]

    21st Century Despotism — Public Sector Unions 

    In the 17th Century Montesquieu evolved the principle of “separation of powers” so that governments could be set up “so that no man need be afraid of another”. The principle has become the basis for many governments to this day. 

    The three powers of government — legislative, executive and judicial — were to be clearly defined so that no one branch could usurp power. Checks and balances evolved. 

    However, the 21st Century has seen the emergence of a new absolute power in the form of public sector unions — a parallel fourth branch of government. They usurp power through aggressive collective bargaining and ongoing rent-seeking. Collective bargaining is hardly bargaining in any everyday sense because it is secretive and in the end amounts to appeasement for the sake of labor peace. Rent-seeking is a term rarely used due to its dual meanings, but in economics it means the privileges lobbies enjoy as they gain government favors, and consequently, government worker unions are extra privileged because of working within government itself. 

    I am sure someone else could say this much better and provide more analysis. But, in my view, it’s this fourth branch of government that is usurping power, bankrupting our societies, and distorting what good governance is about. 

    This despotism — actually, a non-violent invasion — should not be something we helplessly endure.The three powers of government — legislative, executive and judicial — were to be clearly defined so that no one branch could usurp power. Checks and balances evolved. 

    However, the 21st Century has seen the emergence of a new absolute power in the form of public sector unions — a parallel fourth branch of government. They usurp power through aggressive collective bargaining and ongoing rent-seeking. Collective bargaining is hardly bargaining in any everyday sense because it is secretive and in the end amounts to appeasement for the sake of labor peace. Rent-seeking is a term rarely used due to its dual meanings, but in economics it means the privileges lobbies enjoy as they gain government favors, and consequently, government worker unions are extra privileged because of working within government itself. 

    I am sure someone else could say this much better and provide more analysis. But, in my view, it’s this fourth branch of government that is usurping power, bankrupting our societies, and distorting what good governance is about. 

    This despotism — actually, a non-violent invasion — should not be something we helplessly endure.

    [3 replies — 1). . .  pretty much sums it up! Thank you! 2) Well said! 3)

    In the Eastern Bloc under Communism this phenomenon was called the Nomenklatura. Loses in the translation but equivalent to our public sector Sunshine List ! Beware of the socialist nanny state – those who claim to look after you will in fact look after themselves first – as exemplified by our public sector unions and the politicians they in effect control …. ]


  3. 21st Century Learning – Petitions, Reviews

    May 6, 2014 by Tunya

    Cults of Progressivism & Common Core Need Scrutiny

    Most of the Western World has been infected with force-fed education changes called “transformations”.

    In Canada we have Personalized Learning, Inspired Education, Achieving Excellence — all with the same template as Common Core and same narratives but with different titles. Internationally, and within UN agencies, these are seen as 21st Century Learning projects preparing students for career, college and citizenship.

    In England a new book is calling Progressivism to account. By Googling you will find many informative reviews for — Progressively Worse: The Burden of Bad Ideas in British Schools, by Robert Peal. Here is part of the foreword:https://teachingbattleground.wordpress.com/2014/04/28/progressively-worse-a-subversive-text/

    For many people uneasy about these 21st Century presumptuous education projects the most disturbing thing is the methods used to bring about compliance. Implementation is seen as coercive and stealthy. These transformations have not been justified by any demonstrated need nor grounded in evidence-based research. Many of the approaches are experimental with no protocols assuring safeguards to students. These methods to extract agreement are objectionable and not in keeping with democratic principles.

    Since many public teachers are guaranteed “autonomy” in selection of materials for lessons they can select from a wide range of materials that may very well be ideologically slanted. Or the teacher might be thus inclined anyway and search for compatible material. This is happening regarding the 21st Century Competency Goal of “critical thinking” which we might agree is desirable and needed. However, just simply checking for texts on Amazon without even going to textbook publishers one would be alarmed to find books on Critical Theory and Critical Pedagogy, many of which convey pure Marxist doctrine teaching social justice and who is oppressed and needs “emancipation”.

    I think our politicians are beginning to see how education of the young needs more information and oversight regarding this public service. Australia is already well into two reviews — into The National Curriculum and into Teacher Training. England has just announced a Review into Initial Teacher Training.

    [my comment on Education News today http://www.educationviews.org/sign-letter-common-core-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-356486

     

     


  4. Matthew Effect Is A Concern

    April 22, 2014 by Tunya

    Matthew Effect Is A Concern

    Look up Matthew Effect on the Internet. Basically it refers to the observed result 
    that children who fail to read at grade level start slipping — not only in the skill of reading but also in other respects, demonstrating diminished love of reading, diminished love of learning as a whole, diminished self-esteem, etc.

    In other words, they become “disabled” and incrementally become “more disabled” due to poor reading ability or poor or absent teaching of reading skills. In medicine this 
    acquired disorder is called an iatrogenic outcome, induced by the treatment — an infection, complication of treatment, etc.

    What a coincidence.

    I’m from Canada and a friend just happened to be in Las Vegas when this story broke. This is what she wrote:

    “You know, if a Martian were to visit Clark County and try to find out what to do about the board's poor literacy results, it would probably take the Martian about an hour to learn that additional spending and trying harder haven't worked elsewhere, while abolishing Balanced Literacy and instituting systematic phonics has worked elsewhere. One has to wonder why these truths elude the new superintendent of the Clark County School District.”

    Well, your superintendent certainly has it right about the Grade Three turnaround point: “We know students have to be successful by the end of third grade.”

    The news story goes on: “Skorkowsky set one overarching goal that must be met by students, even though the details of getting there remain unclear. All children must show grade-level reading skills by the end of third grade, the pivotal point where students transition from learning to read to now reading to learn. “

    What about pinpointing the problem closer to the Reading Program? Why not consider systematic phonics in elementary years instead of Balanced Literacy? Will this upset the “consultants” in Head Office?

     

    [published Apr 22, 2014 on Las Vegas Review-Journal   http://www.reviewjournal.com/news/education/school-district-chief-pledges-full-review-all-spending ]


  5. Teachers ruling “bittersweet”

    March 5, 2014 by Tunya

    In the ongoing School Wars of British Columbia the latest "Victory" was achieved by the teachers' union, the BCTF.  Judge Griffin ruled that the government did no bargain in good faith cvoncerning issues of class size and composition, that previous arrangements should be restored and fined the government $2million.

    Teacher unionists were of mixed mind since appeals and negotiations were ongoing. I wrote a letter-to-the editor to our local paper, but it did not get published.  Below is a copy:

     

    The patience of parents and public alike has been sorely tested by the endless conflicts between the teachers’ union and the government.

    What we fail to remember is that these struggles have been going on for over 40 years, not the 12-year period recently highlighted by the recent BC Supreme Court decision (BCTF vs BC, 2014).  Furthermore, this happens regardless of the political stripe of the government of the day — be it Social Credit, NDP or Liberal.

    This is a power struggle that may never be sorted out. Legal actions bankrupt resources. Students are shortchanged.  And parents, who are ultimately responsible for their children’s education, are left unsure, frustrated and unable to pursue their children’s best interests.

    Much of the problem rests with the service model adopted to ensure an educated public.  The mistake is to consider education as a public utility that only a government monopoly can provide.  The predictable happens — special interests vie for control and interfere with the intended mission.

    However, if the common good of appropriately educated students is to be served, why not seek alternative models to deliver the desired outcomes?

    Even now, economists are warning that many school graduates are not meeting career or college expectations. But so much is known about what works in education and much more can be achieved with greater innovation, flexibility and stability.

    Why not release the public education dollar and have it follow the student?  Charter schools are working elsewhere.  Education Savings Accounts are being used in some US states for parents to shop and mix-and-match education choices for their kids. In particular, special needs and talents are better served in this manner.

    This current impasse provides a great opportunity to try different ways to help our kids and grandkids get the education they need for the 21st Century.