RSS Feed

‘Parent Tribal Memory’ Category

  1. 40 years ago – recommendations

    January 28, 2014 by Tunya

    The Public Testimony on Public Schools made recommendations to improve American schools and their governance.

    1. Steps be taken to improve the "legislative process" in educational policy making . . . a rredistribution of responsibilities for policy decision at each legislative level — state, local district, and school.
    2. A council at each school with appropriate responsiblity and authority. The school council should b e elected and should share authority and responsibility for curriculum, school program budgeting, school progress reports, and personnel evaluation.
    3. a) Responsibility for negotiations with teachers remain with the local school board . . . provided with independent staffsor consultants to assist in analyzingthe impact of b argaining demands and in developing strategies and policies and b) School boards should seek independent advice or staff to dev elop policies that represent a balance between professional and lay concerns.
    4. A local school board establish procedures to involve the public responsibly in the process of negotiations. a) inclusion of citizens in the development of school bargainig positions; b) public hearings; c) broad dissemination and distribution of the board's position on the major bargaining issues d) open and publicized negotiations; e) press notification of meetings.
    5. State legislatures substantially increase the power of and the staff support for education committees so that there can be effective legislative monitoring. 
    6. more later 

  2. 40 yrs Ago — Have Things Changed in Education?

    January 27, 2014 by Tunya

    I'm going to draw parallels from how parents were treated 40 years ago to today.

    My first experiences of frustration and stonewalling by "the system" led me to search far and wide for help. Locally, little was available, and the PTA was, as we know, tame and in place to maintain the status quo.

    I searched the literature, and one of the first items of note was an American group, National Committee for Citizens in Education (NCCE).  They did good work on parent rights, student records and did a fabulous newspaper.  Will bring these forward from time to time.

    Note: That was 40 years ago.  Before today's quick, instant searches via Internet.

    Today, I'm just going to list the Table of Contents of their book  Public Testimony on Public Schools, 1975 to show the extent of their findings after hearings and research:

    1. School Governance in Trouble
    2. The Public Hearings: Pressure Systems
    3. The Public Hearings: The Central Issues
    4. The Public Hearings: The Underlying Concepts of Governance and Policy Making
    5. The Erosion of Lay Control
    6. Teachers' Organizations and Bargaining: Power Imbalance in the Public Sphere
    7. Alternative Educational Experiences: The Demand for Change
    8. The structure of Citizen Participation: Public Decision for Public Schools
    9. A Plan for Governance: Recommendations and Dissent

    I will start with the recommendations in a subsequent post.

    For now, I would recommend that those intently interested in this topic of parent involvement and it's history to get this book, used, as there are still copies floating around.  It provides some sense of the importance of parent involvement then, and now. The "now" is becoming VERY, VERY important — now — because we are being overwhelmed by new forces which are intent on "transforming" education for the 21st Century — with litte regard for parents.  They are being sidelined even more than ever before.  

    The only thing that will save parent rights, role and duty in the education of their children is for parents to embody the law which is on their side as having the primary responsibility for education.  Issues of parental consent will become ever more crucial.  This book will help trace the gradual and, I would say, deliberate erosion of parents in education.  

    [I will be looking, hard and long, even with the help of the Internet, for literature on how modern-day usurpers and colonialists pacify and exploit their subjects. TA]


  3. Why Home Education Matters

    January 26, 2014 by Tunya

    [Please see earlier article:  Birth of the Home Education "Movement" in this blog, Jan 11 http://www.parentsteachingparents.net/2014/01/home-education-as-a-movement/. That piece was also published online here https://gaither.wordpress.com/2011/02/17/john-holts-conversion-to-home-education/  After a month I submitted amplifation to my views with the following, particularly my polint about the significance of the One Percenters.  In this day and age, January 2014, that remark takes on greater importance as anxieties spread concerning 21st Century Learning projects now being incorporated into education systems internationally without the forsight of proven evidence or approval of the communities served.]

    Why Home Education Matters

    I wrote the article “The Birth of the Home Education Movement” in 2010 after we knew that home educators in California were safe from legal sanctions or having their children seized for truancy. There was that political threat before the courts in 2008 – claiming that parents needed teaching credentials before teaching their children at home.

    In explaining the issues on an education blog I had mentioned how important this case was and that it was a godsend in this day and age that we had the quick services of the Internet to communicate and raise the alarm and support the cause. I had sent many comments to as many outlets as I could – ranging from Focus on the Family to John Stossel program and as many homeschooling sites that I could find.

    However, one naysayer said: “So what? They’re probably only 1 percent of the school population.”

    That is when I knew I had to write about the freedoms that home educators exemplify in a world growing increasingly unfree and compromised by political and power agendas. I had to point out how prescient John Holt was when he made his famous quote on freedom – a proclamation against the dangers ahead – that should be tacked-up on all our bulletin boards:

    “Today freedom has different enemies. It must be fought for in different ways. It will take very different qualities of mind and heart to save it.” – John Holt

    When I had met with John in Mexico, during the lectures of Ivan Illich of “Deschooling” fame, he was still an ardent school reformer. He was aware of home educators and that they were few and far between and rather timid about legalities. But, John was struck by my comments about intending to educate my children at home – by the firm resolve I showed. I was bolstered by the fact that my research had shown that school acts in the UK and North America provided the “elsewhere” or “otherwise” language to do so. That is when he exclaimed “Smart City!” – a comment which actually threw me as I had never heard such a term before.

    I think my adamant firmness of belief was what caused what I have called a “Eureka moment” and others have characterized as a “conversion” to home education. It wasn’t that John Holt was unaware of these home educating possibilities. It seemed to me then, as a young mother with two little children and agreeing with him about the themes of his early books (How Children Fail, How Children Learn, The Underachieving School), that he had this “Ah-ha! Moment” and started considering a switch from his school reform efforts to supporting a home education movement more akin to his beliefs about education.

    In my article I called his efforts the beginning of a “movement” even though I was well aware of the Quakers, the Moores and others in their work with Christian families. John Holt had the mailing lists, the networks and the foresight to start his newsletter “Growing Without Schooling” and the rest is history, I said.

    The One Percenters in Home Education today, with the growing literature and materials available, provide a solid testament and inspiration to many who embrace alternative, independent forms of education. Additionally, these One Percenters are a visible and steadfast witness to legislators and opponents about the validity and legality of educating children in family units.

     

     


  4. Parent Tribal Memory – Comment #1

    January 25, 2014 by Tunya

    Jan 01, 2014, I resolved to try to make-up for what other organizations have and parents do not — an institutional memory.  All the groups school parents deal with have some continuity that assists them in fulfilling their roles and advancing their positions.  The teachers have their unions, principals their associations, trustees their organizations.  And, they have a running record of their achievements and access to information when problems arise.

    Parents are handicapped as they are always starting from scratch if they have a concern or problem.

    Constantly reinventing the wheel.  Of course this leaves parents in an unfair position.  After 45 years in the trenches so to speak, with grandchildren in schools, I feel I can help a little in this regard.

    Today, I reproduce a post I made in one of my earlier blogs 6 years ago.  I will comment later about what the interval tells us — in 2008 and to today in 2014.

    DECEITS IN EDUCATION

    The education systems I follow – Canadian, American, and UK – are so ponderously top-heavy on the supply-side of education economics that they can only survive from toppling over by using complex, interlocking schemes that deliberately and successfully thwart reform efforts from the demand-side (the customers). Having usurped the rightful “property” and duty of parents and teachers, they cling to power and influence by deceitful methods.
     

    There are probably 101 DECEITS that impede effective education. I will start listing a few and you can add others.
     

       1. We aim for a classless society. Yet, by denial of choice in education, poor or disadvantaged students are prevented from overcoming limitations and leave school with deficient skills for quality life, work, or further education. Lack of choice frustrates social mobility. Equality of opportunity applies to the rich who can buy private education or move to catchment areas where schools respond to articulate customers.

          Look at the array of obstructionists that prevent CHOICE mechanisms from operating (magnet schools, charter schools, vouchers, open access….) and you start to see a good picture of those vested interests that benefit from a monopoly, state supply system.

       2. We have civilian governance of education. That is, trustees, are elected from the community to ensure that schools are run for the benefit of the students and not the providers (teachers, administrators, teacher educators, etc.) Yet, how many trustees do we see that are themselves educators, ex-educators, or ex-teacher union leaders with hidden agendas? And, they are quickly trained and domesticated to follow the dictates of the administrators. Some simply exploit this experience as an opportunistic stepping stone in pursuit of higher political aspirations.
       3. High costs of education are mainly due to teacher salaries. Yet, is this true? Compute all the overhead and subsidiary costs of the system. Factor in top dollar salaries of administrators and the rest of this bureaucratic empire. Don’t forget the costs of lawyers who are always on call in case of disputes. And, don’t forget the costs of Public Relations experts, conflict resolution experts, facilitators…..
       4. Parent involvement is very important to boost student achievement. Yes, research supports the correlation between student achievement and parent involvement, yet the current waves of soliciting more parent participation results in only more fund and fun-raising activities – not academic attention. Furthermore, whole industries of “parent involvement practitioners” are spinning off of this fad, further providing jobs for unemployed education PhD’s, adding more layers of “experts” and further mystifying parents and keeping them at bay.
       5. Education enables young people to be self-sufficient adults. However, the rising tide of mediocrity and dependency arising from “illiterate” grads is troubling. In some populations over 40% of students are drop-outs, leading to underemployment or dependence on welfare.

    The poor economic performance in France and Germany is blamed on the education systems which prepare students for government welfare (“Learning to Love the Dole”) more than they do for entrepreneurship or productive employment. See: Europe’s Philosophy of Failure here: http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=4095

     

     

     


  5. Math is the “Red Flag” We Need to Wrestle With

    January 24, 2014 by Tunya

    If government can screw up Math so badly — a subject that should be relatively tamper proof — what else are they screwing up? Let’s not consider Social Studies or Reading or Science for now — Math is scary enough.

    It’s been determined that curriculum responsibility rests with the applicable Ministry — NOT the teacher union, NOT the text book publishers, NOT the itinerant consultants pushing their agendas.  That is why the Petitions now circulating for improved Math are directed, appropriately, straight at the Minister of Education in charge.

    Pushback is directed to where it might work, that is, if you still believe in government schools doing the education job.  We’re told that parents are leaving for independent schools or home education.

    Even students are asking: “Why should I go to school if they don’t teach?”

    One parent comment I read on this issue said her child is taught Math at home but is sent to school for “socialization.”  Well, dear parent, this may be your biggest mistake. I say that because that is what has happened — incrementally over time. THE MISSION of the public schools seems to have become “socialization”.  Socialization in all three meanings of the term:  1) to place under government control; 2) to make sociable; and 3) to convert to the needs of society.

    Right now this is part of the BIG CONTROVERSY in America against the Common Core Curriculum that aims to put all students in public schools under the control of the central federal government. And this nervousness is starting to emerge in Canada because of the “transformations” being imposed under terms as “personalized learning” or 21st Century skills. 

    This is about a BIG SHIFT — away from knowledge to competencies.

    Knowledge and skills can be measured and Ministries are being convinced to move away from these accountability means.  As a replacement, they are buying into competencies such as problem solving and collaboration and creativity.  And that’s where “discovery” Math comes in.  Part of the Big Shift.

    This is not proven good pedagogy.  But, it is a good umbrella for ideological agendas as social justice, social responsibility, global stewardship.  In our BC curriculum one of the Resources (“Making Space” pg24) says:

    •                Ensure that diverse examples are included when conducting number operations and statistics activities (e.g., representing diverse cultures, family structures, socioeconomic levels, etc.)

    • . . . students can look at numbers that reflect inequalities of income or resource distribution . . . to speculate about possible reasons for some of the disparities identified

    NOTE: This is for MATH in Kindergarten to Grade 3, ages 6 – 9 !

    Part of the Big Shift is that “over-arching themes” are to be embedded, across the curriculum, into all subjects.  Sustainability and global citizenship are two such themes.  Social justice and diversity are two more.

    In Australia, for 6 years a New National Curriculum was being developed under the Labor government.  The New Curriculum became a contentious issue in the latest Federal election and the new conservative government has just announced a Review.  A Report is due in 6 months time and its task is to determine what parents and public want from their schools as well as nail down whether there was a left worldview shift stemming from curriculum changes.  These three overarching themes were to be embedded into all subjects — Aboriginal culture, sustainability and global citizenship. 

    Now, my conclusion about a BC Math Petition. We were told before our Election in May 2013 that “regardless of who wins” the election, the new BC Ed Plan curriculum goes ahead, because “It’s international!”  Now, isn’t that so very different from Australia?  There the government runs public education.  Here in BC, and probably in Ontario*, there’s some international mandate at play (?)

    Good Luck with a desired result to your petition.

    [*Is it a coincidence that a day after Al Gore came to Toronto Nov 21, 2013, Kathleen Wynne, Premier of Ontario, announced: “We need to find space to focus on higher-order skills like creativity, collaboration, community and critical thinking . . .  Quite frankly, I know that many of you have been pushing for this for some time and fostering this learning in your own schools and boards.” ? Not saying that Gore is an outrider for the socialist Fabians but he has a connection.  The Deputy Gen Secretary of UK Fabians worked on Gore’s presidential campaign.  Fabian Motto — Educate, Agitate, Organize. ]